Carole Laffont
About
In The Last Decade
Carole Laffont
29 papers receiving 1.5k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 51
- Plant Science 1.4k
- Agronomy and Crop Science 363
- Molecular Biology 340
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 21
- Ecology 19
Countries citing papers authored by Carole Laffont
This map shows the geographic impact of Carole Laffont's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Carole Laffont with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Carole Laffont more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Carole Laffont
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Carole Laffont. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Carole Laffont. The network helps show where Carole Laffont may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Carole Laffont
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Carole Laffont. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Carole Laffont based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Carole Laffont. Carole Laffont is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 16 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 7 | |
| 5 | 46 | |
| 6 | 83 | |
| 7 | 54 | |
| 8 | 28 | |
| 9 | 8 | |
| 10 | 19 | |
| 11 | 104 | |
| 12 | 40 | |
| 13 | 98 | |
| 14 | 7 | |
| 15 | 1 | |
| 16 | 63 | |
| 17 | 7 | |
| 18 | 89 | |
| 19 | 47 | |
| 20 | 238 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.