Carly Green
About
In The Last Decade
Carly Green
6 papers receiving 368 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 50
- Global and Planetary Change 248
- Ecology 141
- Soil Science 140
- Environmental Engineering 78
- Nature and Landscape Conservation 72
Countries citing papers authored by Carly Green
This map shows the geographic impact of Carly Green's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Carly Green with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Carly Green more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Carly Green
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Carly Green. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Carly Green. The network helps show where Carly Green may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Carly Green
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Carly Green. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Carly Green based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Carly Green. Carly Green is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 6 | |
| 2 | 94 | |
| 3 | 101 | |
| 4 | 134 | |
| 5 | 49 | |
| 6 | The role of forests in the global carbon cycle and in climate change policy. | 2 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.