Carl Scheffey

712 citations
18 papers · 585 · h-index 11

Impact in

    • Aquaculture Nutrition and Growth
  • Ecology top 10%
    • Physiological and biochemical adaptations

Papers in

Carl Scheffey

18 papers receiving 547 citations

Peers

Carl Scheffey
Comparison fields: 5 of 72
  • Aquatic Science 176
  • Ecology 229
  • Physiology 40
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 85
  • Metals and Alloys 15
Replace W. Zeiske with:
W. Zeiske Germany
Wolfgang Zeiske Germany
F. Baguet Belgium
Kathleen M. Carter United States
Per Rosenkilde Denmark
Shiko Chichibu Japan
Miriam Morgan United Kingdom
W. Humbert France
George N. Robertson Canada
Klaus Reutter Germany
Carl Scheffey relative to W. Zeiske Germany W. Zeiske's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.0×
W. Zeiske · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Carl Scheffey

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Carl Scheffey's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Carl Scheffey with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Carl Scheffey more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Carl Scheffey

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Carl Scheffey. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Carl Scheffey. The network helps show where Carl Scheffey may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 12 scholars most cited alongside Carl Scheffey, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Carl Scheffey Line = papers co-authored together Carl Scheffey links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

18 of 18 papers shown
#Work
1 1982249
2 198874
3 198639
4 198338
5 201036
6 198521
7
Pitfalls of the vibrating probe technique, and what to do about them.
198619
8 198619
9 199115
10
Electric fields and the vibrating probe, for the uninitiated.
198610
11 199110
12 199110
13 19789
14 20089
15 19899
16
Ionic currents during wall morphogenesis in Micrasterias and Closterium.
19868
17
Current flow measurements from the apical side of toad skin. A vibrating probe analysis.
19865
18 19775

About Carl Scheffey

Carl Scheffey is a scholar working on Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Molecular Biology, Plant Science, Biomedical Engineering and Ecology, having authored 18 papers that have together received 585 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ion channel regulation and function (4 papers), Neuroscience and Neural Engineering (3 papers), Physiological and biochemical adaptations (2 papers), Diatoms and Algae Research (2 papers), Slime Mold and Myxomycetes Research (2 papers), Plant and Biological Electrophysiology Studies (2 papers), Ion Transport and Channel Regulation (2 papers) and Photoreceptor and optogenetics research (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Aquatic Science (176 citations), Ecology (229 citations), Physiology (40 citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (85 citations) and Metals and Alloys (15 citations). Carl Scheffey has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Israel. Frequent co-authors include J. Kevin Foskett, U. Katz, Terry E. Machen, W. Van Driessche, John J. Wille, Brian Wallace, Fred Brody, Khashayar Vaziri, A. Shipley and Hugh S. Isaacs. Their work appears in journals such as Planta, The Journal of Membrane Biology, Surgical Endoscopy, Science and Review of Scientific Instruments.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact