Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Mitigation policies interactions delay the achievement of carbon neutrality in China
This map shows the geographic impact of Canfei He's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Canfei He with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Canfei He more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Canfei He. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Canfei He. The network helps show where Canfei He may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Canfei He
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Canfei He.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Canfei He based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Canfei He. Canfei He is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
He, Canfei, et al.. (2016). Interaction between the spatial dynamics of foreign direct investment and domestic industrial change in Chinese prefecture-level cities. 35(11). 1380.3 indexed citations
10.
Xin, Yang, et al.. (2016). OPTIMIZATION OF RURAL RESIDENTIAL LAND DISTRIBUTION IN MOUNTAINOUS AREA BASED ON WEIGHTED VORONOI DIAGRAM. 37(1). 89.1 indexed citations
Zhu, Shengjun, et al.. (2015). How to jump further? Path dependent and path breaking in an uneven industry space. RePEc: Research Papers in Economics.2 indexed citations
13.
He, Canfei. (2013). Economic Integration and Its Influencing Factors in the Wuhan Urban Agglomeration. Economic Geography.1 indexed citations
14.
He, Canfei. (2013). Industrial Innovation Investments and the Quality of Urban Economic Growth in China. Zhongguo ruankexue.2 indexed citations
15.
He, Canfei. (2013). Banking reform and locational strategy of state-owned commercial banks in China: An empirical study of Industrial and Commercial Bank of China and Bank of China. Geographical Research.1 indexed citations
16.
He, Canfei. (2011). Agglomeration,institutions and the functional location of auto TNCs in China. Geographical Research.2 indexed citations
17.
He, Canfei. (2011). Study on Energy Intensity of Manufacturing Industries in China and Its Determinants. Geography and Geo-Information Science.1 indexed citations
18.
He, Canfei. (2010). ENERGY CONSUMPTION,ECONOMIC GROWTH AND CO_2 EMISSIONS IN CHINA——ANALYSIS BASED ON LOGARITHM MEAN DIVISA DECOMPOSURE METHOD. Changjiang liuyu ziyuan yu huanjing.2 indexed citations
19.
He, Canfei. (2010). The Relationship of Economic Growth and Environment:from the Perspective of Ecological Footprint. Ecological Economy.1 indexed citations
20.
He, Canfei. (2007). Locational accessibility and location of foreign enterprises in Beijing. Geographical Research.4 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.