Cândida Ferrito

11 papers receiving 69 citations

Peers

Cândida Ferrito
Comparison fields: 5 of 37
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 27
  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects 6
  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology 11
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 6
  • Leadership and Management 1
Replace Banambar Ray with:
Banambar Ray India
Fernando Osni Machado Brazil
Hans van Schuppen Netherlands
Christopher Picard Canada
Maj‐Brit Nørregaard Kjær Denmark
Harriet Noble United Kingdom
Samuel Périvier Switzerland
Warren Doherty United Kingdom
Sofía Contreras Spain
Natalie Kostelecky United States
Cândida Ferrito relative to Banambar Ray India Banambar Ray's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Banambar Ray · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Cândida Ferrito

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Cândida Ferrito's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Cândida Ferrito with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Cândida Ferrito more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Cândida Ferrito

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Cândida Ferrito. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Cândida Ferrito. The network helps show where Cândida Ferrito may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 19 scholars most cited alongside Cândida Ferrito, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Cândida Ferrito Line = papers co-authored together Cândida Ferrito links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

13 of 13 papers shown
#Work
1 201820
2 201717
3 201810
4 202010
5 20244
6 20163
7 20202
8 20212
9
Enfermagem baseada na evidência: estudo piloto sobre necessidades de informação científica para a prática de enfermagem
20072
10 20201
11 20201
12 20250
13 20240

About Cândida Ferrito

Cândida Ferrito is a scholar working on Education, Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, Surgery, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine and General Health Professions, having authored 13 papers that have together received 72 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Health Education and Validation (4 papers), Nosocomial Infections in ICU (2 papers), Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (2 papers), Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders (2 papers), Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (2 papers), Healthcare during COVID-19 Pandemic (2 papers), Homelessness and Social Issues (2 papers) and Delphi Technique in Research (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (27 citations), Issues, ethics and legal aspects (6 citations), Radiological and Ultrasound Technology (11 citations), Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (6 citations) and Leadership and Management (1 citation). Cândida Ferrito has collaborated with scholars based in Portugal, Chile and United States. Frequent co-authors include Ana Sabrina Sousa, José Artur Paiva, Beatriz Araújo, Sílvia Caldeira, Fábio Monteiro da Cunha Coelho, Isabel Rabiais, Amélia Simões Figueiredo, Paulo F. Santos, Sérgio Deodato and Ana T. P. C. Gomes. Their work appears in journals such as Intensive and Critical Care Nursing, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, Frontiers in Public Health, Healthcare and Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact