Candice Feiring

6.4k total citations
82 papers, 4.3k citations indexed

About

Candice Feiring is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Social Psychology and Sociology and Political Science. According to data from OpenAlex, Candice Feiring has authored 82 papers receiving a total of 4.3k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 49 papers in Clinical Psychology, 32 papers in Social Psychology and 18 papers in Sociology and Political Science. Recurrent topics in Candice Feiring's work include Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (29 papers), Attachment and Relationship Dynamics (26 papers) and Child Abuse and Trauma (25 papers). Candice Feiring is often cited by papers focused on Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (29 papers), Attachment and Relationship Dynamics (26 papers) and Child Abuse and Trauma (25 papers). Candice Feiring collaborates with scholars based in United States and Canada. Candice Feiring's co-authors include Michael Lewis, Lynn S. Taska, Saul H. Rosenthal, John Jaskir, Charles M. Cleland, Valerie A. Simon, Michael Lewis, Kim G. Dolgin, Deborah L. Coates and Kevin Chen and has published in prestigious journals such as Child Development, Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology and Developmental Psychology.

In The Last Decade

Candice Feiring

81 papers receiving 3.9k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Candice Feiring United States 30 3.0k 1.8k 779 721 720 82 4.3k
Kathleen J. Sternberg United States 35 2.7k 0.9× 2.1k 1.2× 902 1.2× 753 1.0× 685 1.0× 56 4.5k
Shmuel Shulman Israel 35 1.9k 0.6× 1.9k 1.1× 1.0k 1.3× 438 0.6× 288 0.4× 133 3.6k
Patricia K. Kerig United States 36 3.3k 1.1× 1.6k 0.9× 1.2k 1.5× 487 0.7× 617 0.9× 131 4.5k
Marcela Raffaelli United States 39 2.4k 0.8× 1.4k 0.8× 1.8k 2.3× 1.6k 2.2× 667 0.9× 111 5.2k
Maryse H. Richards United States 30 2.1k 0.7× 1.2k 0.7× 1.0k 1.3× 565 0.8× 242 0.3× 70 3.7k
George W. Holden United States 31 4.2k 1.4× 1.0k 0.6× 1.5k 2.0× 890 1.2× 2.0k 2.7× 78 5.5k
Jennifer Connolly Canada 36 2.9k 1.0× 3.3k 1.8× 1.7k 2.1× 1.2k 1.6× 1.4k 2.0× 96 6.1k
Charles M. Borduin United States 33 4.6k 1.5× 1.1k 0.6× 1.2k 1.5× 859 1.2× 345 0.5× 94 5.4k
David S. DeGarmo United States 39 3.7k 1.2× 901 0.5× 1.2k 1.5× 860 1.2× 342 0.5× 100 5.0k
Cheryl Buehler United States 28 1.7k 0.6× 1.3k 0.7× 1.5k 1.9× 387 0.5× 340 0.5× 66 3.4k

Countries citing papers authored by Candice Feiring

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Candice Feiring's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Candice Feiring with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Candice Feiring more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Candice Feiring

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Candice Feiring. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Candice Feiring. The network helps show where Candice Feiring may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Candice Feiring

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Candice Feiring. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Candice Feiring based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Candice Feiring. Candice Feiring is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
2.
Feiring, Candice, et al.. (2023). Emerging adult romantic relationship narratives during COVID‐19: Understanding relational challenges and opportunities. Personal Relationships. 30(2). 522–543. 2 indexed citations
3.
Feiring, Candice, et al.. (2018). Narratives About Specific Romantic Conflicts: Gender and Associations With Conflict Beliefs and Strategies. Journal of Counseling & Development. 96(3). 254–266. 11 indexed citations
4.
Simon, Valerie A., Erin R. Smith, Nicole M. Fava, & Candice Feiring. (2015). Positive and Negative Posttraumatic Change Following Childhood Sexual Abuse Are Associated With Youths’ Adjustment. Child Maltreatment. 20(4). 278–290. 18 indexed citations
5.
Simon, Valerie A., Candice Feiring, & Charles M. Cleland. (2014). Early stigmatization, PTSD, and perceived negative reactions of others predict subsequent strategies for processing child sexual abuse.. Psychology of Violence. 6(1). 112–123. 18 indexed citations
6.
Feiring, Candice, Valerie A. Simon, & Charles M. Cleland. (2009). Childhood sexual abuse, stigmatization, internalizing symptoms, and the development of sexual difficulties and dating aggression.. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. 77(1). 127–137. 102 indexed citations
7.
Feiring, Candice & Charles M. Cleland. (2007). Childhood sexual abuse and abuse-specific attributions of blame over 6 years following discovery. Child Abuse & Neglect. 31(11-12). 1169–1186. 69 indexed citations
8.
Rosenthal, Saul H., Candice Feiring, & Lynn S. Taska. (2003). Emotional support and adjustment over a year’s time following sexual abuse discovery. Child Abuse & Neglect. 27(6). 641–661. 68 indexed citations
9.
Feiring, Candice, Lynn S. Taska, & Michael Lewis. (2002). Adjustment following sexual abuse discovery: The role of shame and attributional style.. Developmental Psychology. 38(1). 79–92. 186 indexed citations
10.
Feiring, Candice, Deborah L. Coates, & Lynn S. Taska. (2001). Ethnic Status, Stigmatization, Support, and Symptom Development Following Sexual Abuse. Journal of Interpersonal Violence. 16(12). 1307–1329. 29 indexed citations
11.
Lewis, Michael, Candice Feiring, & Saul H. Rosenthal. (2000). Attachment over Time. Child Development. 71(3). 707–720. 200 indexed citations
12.
Furman, Wyndol, Willard W. Hartup, B. Bradford Brown, et al.. (1999). The Development of Romantic Relationships in Adolescence. Cambridge University Press eBooks. 495 indexed citations
13.
Lewis, Michael B. & Candice Feiring. (1998). Families, risks, and competence. 4 indexed citations
14.
Feiring, Candice. (1996). Concepts of Romance in 15-Year-Old Adolescents.. Journal of Research on Adolescence. 6(2). 181–200. 155 indexed citations
15.
Feiring, Candice, Lynn S. Taska, & Michael Lewis. (1996). A process model for understanding adaptation to sexual abuse: The role of shame in defining stigmatization. Child Abuse & Neglect. 20(8). 767–782. 123 indexed citations
16.
Lewis, Michael & Candice Feiring. (1989). Infant, Mother, and Mother-Infant Interaction Behavior and Subsequent Attachment. Child Development. 60(4). 831–831. 94 indexed citations
17.
Lewis, Michael, et al.. (1984). Predicting Psychopathology in Six-Year-Olds from Early Social Relations. Child Development. 55(1). 123–123. 216 indexed citations
18.
Feiring, Candice, Michael B. Lewis, & John Jaskir. (1983). Birth of a Sibling. Journal of Developmental & Behavioral Pediatrics. 4(3). 190–195. 8 indexed citations
19.
Feiring, Candice & Michael Lewis. (1979). Sex and Age Differences in Young Children's Reactions to Frustration: A Further Look at the Goldberg and Lewis Subjects. Child Development. 50(3). 848–848. 12 indexed citations
20.
Feiring, Candice & Michael Lewis. (1979). Sex and Age Differences in Young Children's Reactions to Frustration: A Further Look at the Goldberg and Lewis Subjects. Child Development. 50(3). 848–853. 10 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026