Camilla L. Wong

1.9k total citations
42 papers, 1.2k citations indexed

About

Camilla L. Wong is a scholar working on Geriatrics and Gerontology, Surgery and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine. According to data from OpenAlex, Camilla L. Wong has authored 42 papers receiving a total of 1.2k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 16 papers in Geriatrics and Gerontology, 14 papers in Surgery and 11 papers in Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine. Recurrent topics in Camilla L. Wong's work include Frailty in Older Adults (13 papers), Hip and Femur Fractures (12 papers) and Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (11 papers). Camilla L. Wong is often cited by papers focused on Frailty in Older Adults (13 papers), Hip and Femur Fractures (12 papers) and Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (11 papers). Camilla L. Wong collaborates with scholars based in Canada, United Kingdom and United States. Camilla L. Wong's co-authors include Sharon E. Straus, Jayna Holroyd‐Leduc, David L. Simel, Barbara Haas, Amanda McFarlan, Catherine Talbot‐Hamon, Ba’ Pham, Jennifer Watt, Andrea C. Tricco and Douglas Sinclair and has published in prestigious journals such as JAMA, Journal of Clinical Oncology and Annals of Surgery.

In The Last Decade

Camilla L. Wong

38 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Camilla L. Wong Canada 16 434 390 321 300 237 42 1.2k
Lauren J. Gleason United States 13 425 1.0× 255 0.7× 282 0.9× 320 1.1× 219 0.9× 38 1.0k
Sanjay Mohanty United States 9 153 0.4× 266 0.7× 363 1.1× 414 1.4× 59 0.2× 36 898
Russel J. Roberts United States 19 954 2.2× 138 0.4× 207 0.6× 315 1.1× 767 3.2× 78 1.7k
Aluko A. Hope United States 15 549 1.3× 170 0.4× 115 0.4× 72 0.2× 107 0.5× 48 1.1k
Anna Schandl Sweden 22 482 1.1× 62 0.2× 289 0.9× 103 0.3× 132 0.6× 66 1.2k
María Teresa Vidán Spain 25 387 0.9× 838 2.1× 925 2.9× 1.8k 5.9× 152 0.6× 84 3.0k
Craig R. Bailey United Kingdom 16 129 0.3× 86 0.2× 570 1.8× 249 0.8× 542 2.3× 81 1.3k
Lauren E. Ferrante United States 18 517 1.2× 467 1.2× 226 0.7× 121 0.4× 19 0.1× 54 1.3k
Danielle Ní Chróinín Australia 19 124 0.3× 155 0.4× 134 0.4× 273 0.9× 52 0.2× 71 890
Andrew Tang United States 31 470 1.1× 163 0.4× 1.1k 3.5× 350 1.2× 47 0.2× 156 2.9k

Countries citing papers authored by Camilla L. Wong

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Camilla L. Wong's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Camilla L. Wong with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Camilla L. Wong more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Camilla L. Wong

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Camilla L. Wong. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Camilla L. Wong. The network helps show where Camilla L. Wong may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Camilla L. Wong

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Camilla L. Wong. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Camilla L. Wong based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Camilla L. Wong. Camilla L. Wong is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Navab, Elham, Kristen R. Haase, Amir Hossein Goudarzian, et al.. (2025). Interventions to support caregivers of older adults undergoing surgery: A systematic review. The American Journal of Surgery. 242. 116226–116226.
2.
3.
4.
Conn, Lesley Gotlib, Avery B. Nathens, Damon C. Scales, et al.. (2023). A qualitative study of older adult trauma survivors’ experiences in acute care and early recovery. CMAJ Open. 11(2). E323–E328. 1 indexed citations
5.
Khalil, Noha, Emily Hladkowicz, Manoj M. Lalu, et al.. (2023). A systematic review of perioperative clinical practice guidelines for care of older adults living with frailty. British Journal of Anaesthesia. 130(3). 262–271. 9 indexed citations
6.
Chesney, Tyler R., et al.. (2023). Geriatric assessment and treatment decision-making in surgical oncology. Current Opinion in Supportive and Palliative Care. 17(1). 22–30. 4 indexed citations
7.
Watt, Jennifer, et al.. (2023). Geriatric Specialists’ Perspectives on Telemedicine during the COVID-19 Pandemic: a Concurrent Triangulation Mixed-Methods Study*. Canadian Geriatrics Journal. 26(2). 283–289. 2 indexed citations
8.
Chesney, Tyler R., Camilla L. Wong, Andrea C. Tricco, et al.. (2022). Frailty assessment tools for use by surgeons when evaluating older adults prior to surgery: a scoping review protocol. BMJ Open. 12(7). e061951–e061951. 3 indexed citations
9.
Lau, Lorraine, et al.. (2022). Trauma in the Aging Population. Emergency Medicine Clinics of North America. 41(1). 183–203. 6 indexed citations
10.
Wong, Camilla L., et al.. (2020). Using a clinical process map to identify prescribing cascades in your patient. BMJ. 368. m261–m261. 26 indexed citations
11.
Wong, Camilla L., et al.. (2020). Do Interest Groups Cultivate Interest? Trajectories of Geriatric Interest Group Members. Canadian Geriatrics Journal. 23(3). 210–215. 10 indexed citations
12.
Watt, Jennifer, Andrea C. Tricco, Catherine Talbot‐Hamon, et al.. (2018). Identifying older adults at risk of harm following elective surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Medicine. 16(1). 2–2. 125 indexed citations
13.
Watt, Jennifer, Andrea C. Tricco, Catherine Talbot‐Hamon, et al.. (2018). Identifying Older Adults at Risk of Delirium Following Elective Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Journal of General Internal Medicine. 33(4). 500–509. 88 indexed citations
14.
Wong, Camilla L., et al.. (2018). #CGS2015: An Evaluation of Twitter Use at the Canadian Geriatrics Society Annual Scientific Meeting. Canadian Geriatrics Journal. 21(2). 166–172. 15 indexed citations
15.
Cheung, Annie W.L., et al.. (2017). Canadian Study of Health and Aging Clinical Frailty Scale: Does It Predict Adverse Outcomes among Geriatric Trauma Patients?. Journal of the American College of Surgeons. 225(5). 658–665e3. 86 indexed citations
16.
Straus, Sharon E., et al.. (2015). Room transfers and the risk of delirium incidence amongst hospitalized elderly medical patients: a case–control study. BMC Geriatrics. 15(1). 69–69. 36 indexed citations
17.
Wong, Camilla L. & Shree Bhalerao. (2010). Post-Surgery Musical Hallucinations of a Patriotic Canadian Song. Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences / Journal Canadien des Sciences Neurologiques. 37(6). 901–903. 2 indexed citations
18.
Wong, Camilla L., Jayna Holroyd‐Leduc, David L. Simel, & Sharon E. Straus. (2010). Does This Patient Have Delirium?. JAMA. 304(7). 779–779. 289 indexed citations
19.
Wong, Camilla L., Nick Bansback, Philip E. Lee, & Aslam H. Anis. (2009). Cost-Effectiveness: Cholinesterase Inhibitors and Memantine in Vascular Dementia. Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences / Journal Canadien des Sciences Neurologiques. 36(6). 735–739. 11 indexed citations
20.
Tan, Chee‐Kiat, Pierce K. H. Chow, Michael Findlay, Camilla L. Wong, & David Machin. (2000). Use of tamoxifen in hepatocellular carcinoma: A review and paradigm shift. Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology. 15(7). 725–729. 26 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Lauren J. Gleason Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Sanjay Mohanty Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Russel J. Roberts Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Aluko A. Hope Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Anna Schandl Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by María Teresa Vidán Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Craig R. Bailey Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Lauren E. Ferrante Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Danielle Ní Chróinín Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Andrew Tang
Rankless by CCL
2026