Calliope Fine
Impact in
- Obstetrics and Gynecology top 2%
- Uterine Myomas and Treatments
- Gynecological conditions and treatments
- Reproductive Medicine top 5%
- Endometriosis Research and Treatment
Papers in
-
- Uterine Myomas and Treatments 4
- Gynecological conditions and treatments 1
- Ureteral procedures and complications 1
-
- Endometriosis Research and Treatment 4
- Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment 2
- Co-authors
- Andrew J. Friedman (4 shared papers)Robert L. Barbieri (2 shared papers)Peter M. Doubilet (2 shared papers)Isaac Schiff (2 shared papers)David Adams (1 shared paper)David C. Brooks (1 shared paper)Mitchell S. Rein (2 shared papers)Albert L. Bundy (3 shared papers)
- Journals
- Obstetrical & Gynecological Survey (2 papers)Fertility and Sterility (2 papers)The Journal of Urology (1 paper)The American Journal of Surgery (1 paper)Journal of Clinical Ultrasound (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Calliope Fine
9 papers receiving 340 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 30
- Obstetrics and Gynecology 200
- Reproductive Medicine 146
- Urology 43
- Emergency Medicine 49
- Surgery 99
Countries citing papers authored by Calliope Fine
This map shows the geographic impact of Calliope Fine's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Calliope Fine with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Calliope Fine more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Calliope Fine
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Calliope Fine. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Calliope Fine. The network helps show where Calliope Fine may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 21 scholars most cited alongside Calliope Fine, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1988 | 163 | |
| 2 | 1988 | 46 | |
| 3 | 1988 | 43 | |
| 4 | 1992 | 41 | |
| 5 | 1994 | 25 | |
| 6 | 1984 | 23 | |
| 7 | 1986 | 14 | |
| 8 | 1986 | 2 | |
| 9 | 1988 | 2 |
About Calliope Fine
Calliope Fine is a scholar working on Obstetrics and Gynecology, Reproductive Medicine, Surgery, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health and Urology, having authored 9 papers that have together received 359 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Endometriosis Research and Treatment (4 papers), Uterine Myomas and Treatments (4 papers), Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment (2 papers), Intraperitoneal and Appendiceal Malignancies (1 paper), Fetal and Pediatric Neurological Disorders (1 paper), Urologic and reproductive health conditions (1 paper), Gynecological conditions and treatments (1 paper) and Ureteral procedures and complications (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Obstetrics and Gynecology (200 citations), Reproductive Medicine (146 citations), Urology (43 citations), Emergency Medicine (49 citations) and Surgery (99 citations). Calliope Fine has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Andrew J. Friedman, Robert L. Barbieri, Peter M. Doubilet, Isaac Schiff, David Adams, David C. Brooks, Mitchell S. Rein, Albert L. Bundy, Margaret Daly and Jerome P. Richie. Their work appears in journals such as Obstetrical & Gynecological Survey, Fertility and Sterility, The Journal of Urology, The American Journal of Surgery and Journal of Clinical Ultrasound.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.