Callie L. McGrath
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 5%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 5%
- Pharmacology top 5%
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 10%
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
- Co-authors
- Helen S. MaybergW. Edward CraigheadBoadie W. DunlopMary E. KelleyPaul E. HoltzheimerR. Cameron CraddockAlexandre R. FrancoKi Sueng Choi
- Topics
- Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (5 papers)Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (3 papers)Mental Health Research Topics (3 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesJapanGermany
In The Last Decade
Callie L. McGrath
9 papers receiving 756 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 59
- Cognitive Neuroscience 510
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 342
- Pharmacology 252
- Psychiatry and Mental health 117
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 98
Countries citing papers authored by Callie L. McGrath
This map shows the geographic impact of Callie L. McGrath's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Callie L. McGrath with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Callie L. McGrath more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Callie L. McGrath
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Callie L. McGrath. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Callie L. McGrath. The network helps show where Callie L. McGrath may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Callie L. McGrath
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Callie L. McGrath. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Callie L. McGrath based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Callie L. McGrath. Callie L. McGrath is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 11 | |
| 2 | 36 | |
| 3 | 46 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 209 | |
| 6 | 26 | |
| 7 | Polygenic Predictors of Antidepressant Treatment-Specific Response | 2 |
| 8 | 354 | |
| 9 | 92 |
About Callie L. McGrath
Callie L. McGrath is a scholar working on Biological Psychiatry, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 9 papers that have together received 777 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (5 papers), Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (3 papers) and Mental Health Research Topics (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biological Psychiatry (91 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (510 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (342 citations). Callie L. McGrath has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Japan and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Helen S. Mayberg, W. Edward Craighead, Boadie W. Dunlop, Mary E. Kelley, Paul E. Holtzheimer, R. Cameron Craddock, Alexandre R. Franco, Ki Sueng Choi, Justin Rajendra and Becky Kinkead. Their work appears in journals such as American Journal of Psychiatry, Biological Psychiatry and Molecular Psychiatry.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.