This map shows the geographic impact of C. Zamantzas's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by C. Zamantzas with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites C. Zamantzas more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by C. Zamantzas. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by C. Zamantzas. The network helps show where C. Zamantzas may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of C. Zamantzas
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of C. Zamantzas.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of C. Zamantzas based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with C. Zamantzas. C. Zamantzas is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Ferrari, A., Anton Lechner, M.J. Barnes, et al.. (2012). UFOs IN THE LHC: OBSERVATIONS, STUDIES AND EXTRAPOLATIONS. Presented at. 3936–3938.7 indexed citations
6.
Nebot, E., B. Dehning, Eva Barbara Holzer, et al.. (2012). DETECTION OF UNIDENTIFIED FALLING OBJECTS AT LHC.2 indexed citations
Dehning, B., et al.. (2012). COMPARISON OF THREE DIFFERENT CONCEPTS OF HIGH DYNAMIC RANGE AND DEPENDABILITY OPTIMISED CURRENT MEASUREMENT DIGITISERS FOR BEAM LOSS SYSTEMS. CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research).6 indexed citations
9.
Nebot, E., Annika Nordt, Mariusz Sapinski, et al.. (2011). HANDLING OF BLM ABORT THRESHOLDS IN THE LHC. Presented at. 2382–2384.3 indexed citations
10.
Yang, Z., Annika Nordt, R. Schmidt, et al.. (2011). ANALYSIS OF FAST LOSSES IN THE LHC WITH THE BLM SYSTEM. Presented at. 1344–1346.8 indexed citations
11.
Dehning, B., et al.. (2011). SELF TESTING FUNCTIONALITY OF THE LHC BLM SYSTEM. CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research).
12.
Goddard, B., et al.. (2011). AUTOMATIC INJECTION QUALITY CHECKS FOR THE LHC. CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research).2 indexed citations
13.
Priebe, Agnieszka, Jens Steckert, Arjan Verweij, et al.. (2011). BEAM-INDUCED QUENCH TEST OF A LHC MAIN QUADRUPOLE. CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research).2 indexed citations
14.
Holzer, Eva Barbara, Annika Nordt, C. Zamantzas, et al.. (2010). Lessons learnt from beam commissioning and early beam operation of the beam loss monitors (including outlook to 5-TeV). 44–50.2 indexed citations
15.
Zamantzas, C., Annika Nordt, Giuseppe Venturini, et al.. (2010). The LHC beam loss monitoring system commissioning for 2010. CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research). 57–66.1 indexed citations
16.
Böhlen, Till T., Chiara Bracco, Stefano Redaelli, et al.. (2009). Energy Deposition Simulations and Measurements in an LHC Collimator and Beam Loss Monitors. CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research).1 indexed citations
17.
Redaelli, Stefano, Chiara Bracco, O. Aberle, et al.. (2009). Operational Experience with a LHC Collimator Prototype in the CERN SPS. CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research).1 indexed citations
18.
Zamantzas, C., et al.. (2009). Configuration and Validation of the LHC Beam Loss Monitoring System. CERN Bulletin.4 indexed citations
19.
Dehning, B., et al.. (2007). Single Gain Radiation Tolerant LHC Beam Loss Acquisition Card.9 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.