C. Tim Osborn

491 total citations
20 papers, 301 citations indexed

About

C. Tim Osborn is a scholar working on Economics and Econometrics, Global and Planetary Change and General Agricultural and Biological Sciences. According to data from OpenAlex, C. Tim Osborn has authored 20 papers receiving a total of 301 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 9 papers in Economics and Econometrics, 6 papers in Global and Planetary Change and 5 papers in General Agricultural and Biological Sciences. Recurrent topics in C. Tim Osborn's work include Economic and Environmental Valuation (9 papers), Agricultural Economics and Policy (5 papers) and Soil erosion and sediment transport (5 papers). C. Tim Osborn is often cited by papers focused on Economic and Environmental Valuation (9 papers), Agricultural Economics and Policy (5 papers) and Soil erosion and sediment transport (5 papers). C. Tim Osborn collaborates with scholars based in United States and Italy. C. Tim Osborn's co-authors include Joseph Cooper, C. Edwin Young, Carmen L. Sandretto, Leonard Shabman, Daniel Colacicco, Ralph E. Heimlich, Marc Ribaudo and Daniel Hellerstein and has published in prestigious journals such as American Journal of Agricultural Economics, JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association and Land Economics.

In The Last Decade

C. Tim Osborn

19 papers receiving 227 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
C. Tim Osborn United States 9 148 93 76 59 44 20 301
Patrick G. Welle United States 5 86 0.6× 110 1.2× 40 0.5× 31 0.5× 40 0.9× 7 283
Shan Ma United States 5 143 1.0× 148 1.6× 107 1.4× 41 0.7× 38 0.9× 6 306
R. Hassan South Africa 7 57 0.4× 59 0.6× 47 0.6× 75 1.3× 40 0.9× 18 261
Dhazn Gillig United States 10 139 0.9× 156 1.7× 26 0.3× 31 0.5× 48 1.1× 17 357
Eric Kreileman Netherlands 8 168 1.1× 228 2.5× 25 0.3× 16 0.3× 44 1.0× 11 456
Ken Genskow United States 7 72 0.5× 46 0.5× 87 1.1× 20 0.3× 34 0.8× 11 241
Huey-Lin Lee Taiwan 8 156 1.1× 110 1.2× 42 0.6× 26 0.4× 46 1.0× 16 287
Steven J. Taff United States 12 272 1.8× 307 3.3× 20 0.3× 24 0.4× 45 1.0× 28 482
David Crespo United Kingdom 9 128 0.9× 165 1.8× 60 0.8× 47 0.8× 47 1.1× 12 303
Richard Iovanna United States 6 191 1.3× 125 1.3× 25 0.3× 9 0.2× 37 0.8× 10 298

Countries citing papers authored by C. Tim Osborn

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of C. Tim Osborn's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by C. Tim Osborn with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites C. Tim Osborn more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by C. Tim Osborn

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by C. Tim Osborn. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by C. Tim Osborn. The network helps show where C. Tim Osborn may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of C. Tim Osborn

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of C. Tim Osborn. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of C. Tim Osborn based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with C. Tim Osborn. C. Tim Osborn is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Ribaudo, Marc, et al.. (2019). Land Retirement as a Tool for Reducing Agricultural Nonpoint Source Pollution. Land Economics. 70(1). 175–185.
2.
Osborn, C. Tim, et al.. (2018). Predicting E. coli concentrations using limited qPCR deployments at Chicago beaches. Water Research X. 2. 100016–100016. 9 indexed citations
3.
Cooper, Joseph & C. Tim Osborn. (1998). The Effect of Rental Rates on the Extension of Conservation Reserve Program Contracts. American Journal of Agricultural Economics. 80(1). 184–194. 62 indexed citations
4.
Sandretto, Carmen L., et al.. (1995). Soil Erosion and Conservation in the United States: An Overview. AgEcon Search (University of Minnesota, USA). 12 indexed citations
5.
Sandretto, Carmen L., et al.. (1995). Soil erosion and conservation in the United States. 718. 29. 7 indexed citations
6.
Sandretto, Carmen L., et al.. (1995). Soil erosion and conservation in the United States: An overview. Agriculture information bulletin. (Final). OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information). 1 indexed citations
7.
Osborn, C. Tim, et al.. (1995). Conservation reserve program: Enrollment statistics for signup periods 1-12 and fiscal years 1986-1993. Statistical bulletin (Final). OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information). 7 indexed citations
8.
Osborn, C. Tim, et al.. (1994). A Preliminary Assessment of the Integrated Crop Management Practice. Staff Reports. 1 indexed citations
9.
Heimlich, Ralph E., et al.. (1993). The Conservation Reserve Program: what happens when contracts expire?. AgEcon Search (University of Minnesota, USA). 8(3). 1–6. 5 indexed citations
10.
Osborn, C. Tim, et al.. (1992). Conservation Reserve Programs: Enrollment statistics for signup periods 1-11 and fiscal years 1990-92. Statistical bulletin. OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information). 2 indexed citations
11.
Osborn, C. Tim, et al.. (1992). Conservation Reserve Programs: Enrollment Statistics for Signup Periods, 1-11 and Fiscal Years 1990-92. AgEcon Search (University of Minnesota, USA). 23 indexed citations
12.
Young, C. Edwin, et al.. (1990). The Conservation Reserve Program: An Economic Assessment. AgEcon Search (University of Minnesota, USA). 31 indexed citations
13.
Osborn, C. Tim, et al.. (1990). A National-Level Economic Analysis of Conservation Reserve Program Participation: A Discrete Choice Approach. AgEcon Search (University of Minnesota, USA). 42(2). 5–12. 51 indexed citations
14.
Osborn, C. Tim, et al.. (1990). Conservation Reserve Program: Enrollment Statistics for Signup Periods 1-9 and Fiscal Year 1989. AgEcon Search (University of Minnesota, USA). 19 indexed citations
15.
Young, C. Edwin & C. Tim Osborn. (1990). Costs and benefits of the Conservation Reserve Program. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation. 45(3). 370–373. 45 indexed citations
16.
Osborn, C. Tim, et al.. (1989). Soil Erosion: What Effect on Agricultural Productivity?. AgEcon Search (University of Minnesota, USA). 6 indexed citations
17.
Osborn, C. Tim, et al.. (1989). Targeting Soil Conservation Incentive Payments. Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy. 11(1). 95–103. 3 indexed citations
18.
Osborn, C. Tim, et al.. (1986). THE ACCURACY OF WATER USE FORECASTS: EVALUATION AND IMPLICATIONS1. JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association. 22(1). 101–109. 9 indexed citations
19.
Osborn, C. Tim, et al.. (1983). Controlling agricultural soil loss in Arkansas’ North Lake Chicot watershed: An analysis of benefits. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation. 38(6). 509–512. 1 indexed citations
20.
Osborn, C. Tim, et al.. (1982). Controlling agricultural soil loss in Arkansas' North Lake Chicot watershed: A cost analysis. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation. 37(3). 182–185. 7 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026