C. Thomas Philbrick
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics top 0.5%
- Molecular Biology top 10%
- Plant Science top 5%
- Nature and Landscape Conservation top 5%
- Ecology top 10%
- Co-authors
- Donald H. LesClaudia Petean BoveD. H. LesLoren H. RiesebergMichael A. HansonRolf RutishauserBrad R. RuhfelJeffrey M. Osborn
- Topics
- Plant Diversity and Evolution (56 papers)Plant and animal studies (40 papers)Plant and Fungal Species Descriptions (29 papers)
- Cited by
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and SystematicsNature and Landscape ConservationEnvironmental Chemistry
- Partner nations
- United StatesMexicoBrazil
In The Last Decade
C. Thomas Philbrick
88 papers receiving 1.6k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 64
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 1.3k
- Molecular Biology 822
- Plant Science 622
- Nature and Landscape Conservation 274
- Ecology 221
Countries citing papers authored by C. Thomas Philbrick
This map shows the geographic impact of C. Thomas Philbrick's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by C. Thomas Philbrick with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites C. Thomas Philbrick more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by C. Thomas Philbrick
This network shows the impact of papers produced by C. Thomas Philbrick. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by C. Thomas Philbrick. The network helps show where C. Thomas Philbrick may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of C. Thomas Philbrick
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of C. Thomas Philbrick. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of C. Thomas Philbrick based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with C. Thomas Philbrick. C. Thomas Philbrick is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 39 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 2 | |
| 6 | 44 | |
| 7 | 7 | |
| 8 | 13 | |
| 9 | 9 | |
| 10 | 5 | |
| 11 | 8 | |
| 12 | 3 | |
| 13 | 22 | |
| 14 | 3 | |
| 15 | 5 | |
| 16 | 22 | |
| 17 | 9 | |
| 18 | 21 | |
| 19 | Distribution of Podostemum ceratophyllum Michw. (Podostemaceae) | 15 |
| 20 | 26 |
About C. Thomas Philbrick
C. Thomas Philbrick is a scholar working on Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Environmental Chemistry and Nature and Landscape Conservation, having authored 88 papers that have together received 1.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Plant Diversity and Evolution (56 papers), Plant and animal studies (40 papers) and Plant and Fungal Species Descriptions (29 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (1.3k citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (274 citations) and Environmental Chemistry (194 citations). C. Thomas Philbrick has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Mexico and Brazil. Frequent co-authors include Donald H. Les, Claudia Petean Bove, D. H. Les, Loren H. Rieseberg, Michael A. Hanson, Rolf Rutishauser, Brad R. Ruhfel, Jeffrey M. Osborn, J. Hugo Cota‐Sánchez and Gregory J. Anderson. Their work appears in journals such as BioScience, Frontiers in Plant Science and Annals of Botany.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.