C. Tess Sheldon

575 total citations
10 papers, 396 citations indexed

About

C. Tess Sheldon is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Political Science and International Relations and Social Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, C. Tess Sheldon has authored 10 papers receiving a total of 396 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 6 papers in Clinical Psychology, 3 papers in Political Science and International Relations and 3 papers in Social Psychology. Recurrent topics in C. Tess Sheldon's work include Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints (3 papers), Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues (2 papers) and Attachment and Relationship Dynamics (2 papers). C. Tess Sheldon is often cited by papers focused on Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints (3 papers), Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues (2 papers) and Attachment and Relationship Dynamics (2 papers). C. Tess Sheldon collaborates with scholars based in Canada and United States. C. Tess Sheldon's co-authors include Paula Goering, Mark A. Whisman, Stephen C. Newman, Roger Bland, Tim Aubry, Geoffrey Nelson, Donald Wasylenki, Joanna Ochocka, Roxanne Mykitiuk and Julio Arboleda‐Flórez and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Abnormal Psychology, Psychological Medicine and American Journal of Orthopsychiatry.

In The Last Decade

C. Tess Sheldon

9 papers receiving 381 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
C. Tess Sheldon Canada 5 238 195 145 60 54 10 396
L. A. Champion United Kingdom 5 198 0.8× 98 0.5× 88 0.6× 40 0.7× 40 0.7× 6 362
Dana Lassri Israel 13 306 1.3× 126 0.6× 71 0.5× 63 1.1× 37 0.7× 33 401
Dan Yoshimoto United States 6 195 0.8× 204 1.0× 55 0.4× 78 1.3× 15 0.3× 7 448
Kelly E. Buckholdt United States 10 400 1.7× 146 0.7× 56 0.4× 57 0.9× 37 0.7× 17 443
Reout Arbel Israel 13 222 0.9× 134 0.7× 68 0.5× 58 1.0× 36 0.7× 35 391
Eunyoe Ro United States 12 561 2.4× 150 0.8× 121 0.8× 109 1.8× 168 3.1× 27 770
Shaina A. Kumar United States 11 231 1.0× 140 0.7× 26 0.2× 68 1.1× 42 0.8× 31 332
Martina K. Narayanan United Kingdom 7 227 1.0× 66 0.3× 64 0.4× 45 0.8× 32 0.6× 10 317
Jamie Bedics United States 10 379 1.6× 133 0.7× 61 0.4× 48 0.8× 30 0.6× 17 460
S. Vearnals United Kingdom 7 248 1.0× 157 0.8× 58 0.4× 50 0.8× 19 0.4× 13 339

Countries citing papers authored by C. Tess Sheldon

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of C. Tess Sheldon's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by C. Tess Sheldon with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites C. Tess Sheldon more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by C. Tess Sheldon

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by C. Tess Sheldon. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by C. Tess Sheldon. The network helps show where C. Tess Sheldon may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of C. Tess Sheldon

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of C. Tess Sheldon. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of C. Tess Sheldon based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with C. Tess Sheldon. C. Tess Sheldon is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

10 of 10 papers shown
1.
Mykitiuk, Roxanne & C. Tess Sheldon. (2020). Confronting Accessibility in Clinical Legal Education: Human Rights Law and the Accommodation of Law Students with Disabilities in External Placements. eYLS (Yale Law School). 32(1). 67–90. 3 indexed citations
2.
Sheldon, C. Tess, et al.. (2018). R v Kapp. Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit. 30(2). 248–267. 1 indexed citations
3.
4.
Sheldon, C. Tess, et al.. (2016). Re-Centering Equality: The Interplay Between Sections 7 and 15 of the “Charter” in Challenges to Psychiatric Detention. 35(2). 193–234.
5.
Sheldon, C. Tess, Lorraine E. Ferris, & Carol Strıke. (2013). Hopeful Result, Unclear Implications: A Comment on Canada (Attorney General) V. PHS Community Services Society. 21(2). 15. 1 indexed citations
6.
Goering, Paula, Janet Durbin, C. Tess Sheldon, et al.. (2006). Who uses consumer-run self-help organizations?. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry. 76(3). 367–373. 11 indexed citations
7.
Sheldon, C. Tess, Tim Aubry, Julio Arboleda‐Flórez, Donald Wasylenki, & Paula Goering. (2005). Social disadvantage, mental illness and predictors of legal involvement. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry. 29(3). 249–256. 10 indexed citations
8.
Whisman, Mark A., C. Tess Sheldon, & Paula Goering. (2000). Psychiatric disorders and dissatisfaction with social relationships: Does type of relationship matter?. Journal of Abnormal Psychology. 109(4). 803–808. 166 indexed citations
9.
Whisman, Mark A., C. Tess Sheldon, & Paula Goering. (2000). Psychiatric disorders and dissatisfaction with social relationships: Does type of relationship matter?. Journal of Abnormal Psychology. 109(4). 803–808. 156 indexed citations
10.
Newman, Stephen C., C. Tess Sheldon, & Roger Bland. (1998). Prevalence of depression in an elderly community sample: a comparison of GMS-AGECAT and DSM-IV diagnostic criteria. Psychological Medicine. 28(6). 1339–1345. 46 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by L. A. Champion Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Dana Lassri Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Dan Yoshimoto Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Kelly E. Buckholdt Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Reout Arbel Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Eunyoe Ro Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Shaina A. Kumar Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Martina K. Narayanan Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Jamie Bedics Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by S. Vearnals
Rankless by CCL
2026