C. Poole

739 total citations
9 papers, 131 citations indexed

About

C. Poole is a scholar working on Artificial Intelligence, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and Nuclear and High Energy Physics. According to data from OpenAlex, C. Poole has authored 9 papers receiving a total of 131 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 7 papers in Artificial Intelligence, 6 papers in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and 2 papers in Nuclear and High Energy Physics. Recurrent topics in C. Poole's work include Quantum Information and Cryptography (7 papers), Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture (7 papers) and Quantum and electron transport phenomena (5 papers). C. Poole is often cited by papers focused on Quantum Information and Cryptography (7 papers), Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture (7 papers) and Quantum and electron transport phenomena (5 papers). C. Poole collaborates with scholars based in United States, Australia and India. C. Poole's co-authors include M. Saffman, Peter J. Love, A. B. Balantekin, S. N. Coppersmith, Calvin W. Johnson, J. Scott, Yuri Alexeev, Yunheung Song, Jonathan Wurtz and Danylo Lykov and has published in prestigious journals such as Physical Review X, Physical review. A and Physical review. C.

In The Last Decade

C. Poole

9 papers receiving 127 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
C. Poole United States	5	106	70	21	12	9	9	131
Antonio Anna Mele Germany	6	176 1.7×	105 1.5×	26 1.2×	10 0.8×	6 0.7×	10	213
Olivia Di Matteo Canada	6	110 1.0×	65 0.9×	12 0.6×	29 2.4×	10 1.1×	15	144
Colin Enderud United States	3	122 1.2×	92 1.3×	15 0.7×	16 1.3×	2 0.2×	3	144
Elizabeth Crosson United States	6	154 1.5×	101 1.4×	23 1.1×	7 0.6×	8 0.9×	8	179
Bálint Koczor United Kingdom	9	157 1.5×	100 1.4×	25 1.2×	13 1.1×	5 0.6×	21	200
Michael A. Perlin United States	10	93 0.9×	176 2.5×	8 0.4×	8 0.7×	4 0.4×	16	219
Andrew Tranter United Kingdom	5	232 2.2×	172 2.5×	43 2.0×	9 0.8×	3 0.3×	7	256
Glen Bigan Mbeng Italy	7	126 1.2×	101 1.4×	21 1.0×	6 0.5×	7 0.8×	10	168
M. Sohaib Alam United States	6	76 0.7×	53 0.8×	22 1.0×	5 0.4×	17 1.9×	9	103
Tanay Roy United States	8	127 1.2×	115 1.6×	15 0.7×	22 1.8×	7 0.8×	22	167

Countries citing papers authored by C. Poole

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of C. Poole's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by C. Poole with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites C. Poole more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by C. Poole

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by C. Poole. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by C. Poole. The network helps show where C. Poole may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of C. Poole

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of C. Poole. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of C. Poole based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with C. Poole. C. Poole is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

9 of 9 papers shown

1.

Poole, C., Trent Graham, Michael A. Perlin, Matthew Otten, & M. Saffman. (2025). Architecture for fast implementation of quantum low-density parity-check codes with optimized Rydberg gates. Physical review. A. 111(2). 9 indexed citations

2.

Poole, C., et al.. (2025). Variational Simulation of the Lipkin-Meshkov-Glick Model on a Neutral Atom Quantum Computer. PRX Quantum. 6(2). 1 indexed citations

3.

Poole, C., et al.. (2024). Benchmarking a neutral-atom quantum computer. International Journal of Quantum Information. 22(4). 1 indexed citations

4.

Lykov, Danylo, Jonathan Wurtz, C. Poole, et al.. (2023). Sampling frequency thresholds for the quantum advantage of the quantum approximate optimization algorithm. npj Quantum Information. 9(1). 22 indexed citations

5.

Song, Yunheung, et al.. (2023). Midcircuit Measurements on a Single-Species Neutral Alkali Atom Quantum Processor. Physical Review X. 13(4). 37 indexed citations

6.

Govia, Luke C. G., C. Poole, M. Saffman, & Hari Krovi. (2021). Freedom of mixer rotation-axis improves performance in the quantum approximate optimization algorithm. arXiv (Cornell University). 13 indexed citations

7.

Balantekin, A. B., S. N. Coppersmith, Calvin W. Johnson, et al.. (2021). Lipkin model on a quantum computer. Physical review. C. 104(2). 45 indexed citations

8.

Bahcall, John N., W. C. Haxton, K. Kubodera, & C. Poole. (2001). Proceedings of the carolina symposium on neutrino physics : its impact on particle physics, astrophysics and cosmology : University of South Carolina, 10-12 March 2000. WORLD SCIENTIFIC eBooks. 1 indexed citations

9.

Bahcall, John N., W. C. Haxton, K. Kubodera, & C. Poole. (2001). Neutrino Physics Its Impact on Particle Physics, Astrophysics and Cosmology. 2 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact