C Mathis

595 total citations · 1 hit paper
7 papers, 369 citations indexed

About

C Mathis is a scholar working on Spectroscopy, Organic Chemistry and Analytical Chemistry. According to data from OpenAlex, C Mathis has authored 7 papers receiving a total of 369 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 5 papers in Spectroscopy, 3 papers in Organic Chemistry and 3 papers in Analytical Chemistry. Recurrent topics in C Mathis's work include Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography (5 papers), Synthesis and Reactions of Organic Compounds (2 papers) and Chromatography in Natural Products (2 papers). C Mathis is often cited by papers focused on Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography (5 papers), Synthesis and Reactions of Organic Compounds (2 papers) and Chromatography in Natural Products (2 papers). C Mathis collaborates with scholars based in . C Mathis's co-authors include Bernice Roberts Kennedy and Angela Woods and has published in prestigious journals such as PubMed.

In The Last Decade

C Mathis

7 papers receiving 351 citations

Hit Papers

align trajectories

What are hit papers?

Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research topics.

African Americans and their distrust of the health care system: healthcare for diverse populations.

2007 347 citations Bernice Roberts Kennedy, C Mathis et al. PubMed profile →

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
C Mathis	4	121	82	77	58	54	7	369
Alvin T. Onaka United States	10	158 1.3×	115 1.4×	60 0.8×	73 1.3×	77 1.4×	23	411
R J Harris India	3	170 1.4×	56 0.7×	101 1.3×	89 1.5×	43 0.8×	4	372
Jeffrey Maurer United States	6	112 0.9×	60 0.7×	111 1.4×	63 1.1×	77 1.4×	9	392
Marie Wolff United States	8	172 1.4×	79 1.0×	105 1.4×	83 1.4×	61 1.1×	20	454
Michelle Owens United States	10	108 0.9×	83 1.0×	100 1.3×	51 0.9×	73 1.4×	17	395
Robert Otto Burciaga Valdez United States	5	171 1.4×	78 1.0×	127 1.6×	164 2.8×	149 2.8×	6	485
Tessie Guillermo United States	3	107 0.9×	51 0.6×	74 1.0×	81 1.4×	68 1.3×	3	389
Walter W. Holland United Kingdom	13	141 1.2×	71 0.9×	41 0.5×	28 0.5×	12 0.2×	50	403
Jeanne Parzuchowski United States	9	147 1.2×	177 2.2×	40 0.5×	35 0.6×	60 1.1×	16	434
E. E. M. Kernohan United Kingdom	11	109 0.9×	77 0.9×	21 0.3×	46 0.8×	26 0.5×	14	349

Countries citing papers authored by C Mathis

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of C Mathis's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by C Mathis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites C Mathis more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by C Mathis

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by C Mathis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by C Mathis. The network helps show where C Mathis may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of C Mathis

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of C Mathis. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of C Mathis based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with C Mathis. C Mathis is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

7 of 7 papers shown

1.

Kennedy, Bernice Roberts, C Mathis, & Angela Woods. (2007). African Americans and their distrust of the health care system: healthcare for diverse populations.. PubMed. 14(2). 56–60. 347 indexed citations breakdown →

2.

Mathis, C, et al.. (1970). [Separation of antibiotics by thin-layer chromatography].. PubMed. 28(3). 205–10. 3 indexed citations

3.

Mathis, C, et al.. (1968). [The combination p-dimethylaminobenzaldehyde and antimony chloride as a detector of antibiotics in thin-layer chromatography].. PubMed. 26(11). 727–30. 3 indexed citations

4.

Mathis, C, et al.. (1966). [Test of pharmaceutical preparations by functional thin-layer chromatography. 3. Preparations containing alkaloids of the strychnine, emetine and lobeline groups].. PubMed. 24(12). 753–62. 1 indexed citations

5.

Mathis, C, et al.. (1965). [ASSAY OF PHARMACEUTICAL PREPARATIONS BY FUNCTIONAL THIN-LAYER CHROMATOGRAPHY. I. PREPARATIONS CONTAINING ALKALOIDS OF THE ATROPINE GROUP].. PubMed. 23. 267–74. 5 indexed citations

6.

Mathis, C. (1965). [Application of functional thin-layer chromatography to the identification of organic substances].. PubMed. 23(5). 331–4. 3 indexed citations

7.

Mathis, C, et al.. (1965). [Assay of pharmaceutical preparations by functional thin-layer chromatography. II. Preparations containing opium and Rauwolfia alkaloids].. PubMed. 23(12). 739–47. 7 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact