C. M. Henry

757 total citations
39 papers, 557 citations indexed

About

C. M. Henry is a scholar working on Plant Science, Endocrinology and Insect Science. According to data from OpenAlex, C. M. Henry has authored 39 papers receiving a total of 557 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 37 papers in Plant Science, 10 papers in Endocrinology and 6 papers in Insect Science. Recurrent topics in C. M. Henry's work include Plant Virus Research Studies (24 papers), Plant and Fungal Interactions Research (10 papers) and Plant Disease Resistance and Genetics (7 papers). C. M. Henry is often cited by papers focused on Plant Virus Research Studies (24 papers), Plant and Fungal Interactions Research (10 papers) and Plant Disease Resistance and Genetics (7 papers). C. M. Henry collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Italy and United States. C. M. Henry's co-authors include J.W. Deacon, G. R. G. Clover, V. Harju, Claudio Ratti, R. H. A. Coutts, Richard A. Jones, Neil Boonham, R. A. Mumford, R. Noble and Giles E. Budge and has published in prestigious journals such as Bioresource Technology, Soil Biology and Biochemistry and Plant and Soil.

In The Last Decade

C. M. Henry

38 papers receiving 461 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
C. M. Henry United Kingdom 14 519 163 83 56 49 39 557
Stellos M. Tavantzis United States 17 816 1.6× 511 3.1× 89 1.1× 75 1.3× 61 1.2× 33 878
Y. Séré Ivory Coast 17 914 1.8× 104 0.6× 101 1.2× 105 1.9× 111 2.3× 57 969
Antje Habekuß Germany 18 1.0k 1.9× 224 1.4× 30 0.4× 137 2.4× 144 2.9× 67 1.1k
Paulo Augusto Vianna Barroso Brazil 15 632 1.2× 159 1.0× 50 0.6× 133 2.4× 92 1.9× 51 702
S. A. Slack United States 18 892 1.7× 134 0.8× 77 0.9× 139 2.5× 81 1.7× 70 931
Z. M. Kinyua Kenya 11 562 1.1× 85 0.5× 34 0.4× 64 1.1× 101 2.1× 28 608
Bong Nam Chung South Korea 20 1.0k 2.0× 340 2.1× 32 0.4× 141 2.5× 204 4.2× 114 1.1k
Shin-Yi Lee Marzano United States 15 783 1.5× 684 4.2× 85 1.0× 58 1.0× 76 1.6× 29 879
R. T. Lewellen United States 17 1.0k 1.9× 160 1.0× 44 0.5× 182 3.3× 130 2.7× 83 1.1k
Dimitre Mollov United States 14 650 1.3× 235 1.4× 49 0.6× 75 1.3× 104 2.1× 98 679

Countries citing papers authored by C. M. Henry

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of C. M. Henry's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by C. M. Henry with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites C. M. Henry more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by C. M. Henry

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by C. M. Henry. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by C. M. Henry. The network helps show where C. M. Henry may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of C. M. Henry

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of C. M. Henry. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of C. M. Henry based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with C. M. Henry. C. M. Henry is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Noble, R., J. W. Woodhall, A. Dobrovin‐Pennington, et al.. (2019). Control of Hymenoscyphus fraxineus, the causal agent of ash dieback, using composting. Forest Pathology. 49(6). 4 indexed citations
2.
Noble, R., A. Dobrovin‐Pennington, Stéphane Pietravalle, Rebecca Weekes, & C. M. Henry. (2011). Indicator organisms for assessing sanitization during composting of plant wastes. Waste Management. 31(8). 1711–1719. 7 indexed citations
3.
Noble, R., James Blackburn, A. Dobrovin‐Pennington, et al.. (2011). Potential for eradication of the exotic plant pathogens Phytophthora kernoviae and Phytophthora ramorum during composting. Plant Pathology. 60(6). 1077–1085. 4 indexed citations
4.
Noble, R., J. G. Elphinstone, C. E. Sansford, Giles E. Budge, & C. M. Henry. (2009). Management of plant health risks associated with processing of plant-based wastes: A review. Bioresource Technology. 100(14). 3431–3446. 22 indexed citations
5.
Ratti, Claudio, et al.. (2004). A multiplex RT-PCR assay capable of distinguishing beet necrotic yellow vein virus types A and B. Journal of Virological Methods. 124(1-2). 41–47. 22 indexed citations
6.
Harju, V., A. Skelton, G. R. G. Clover, et al.. (2004). The use of real-time RT-PCR (TaqMan®) and post-ELISA virus release for the detection of Beet necrotic yellow vein virus types containing RNA 5 and its comparison with conventional RT-PCR. Journal of Virological Methods. 123(1). 73–80. 23 indexed citations
7.
Budge, Giles E., et al.. (2002). Assessment of the resistance of UK winter wheat varieties to the diseases caused by soil-borne wheat mosaic virus and wheat spindle streak mosaic virus.. 121–128. 3 indexed citations
8.
Morris, J., et al.. (2001). Development of a highly sensitive nested RT-PCR method for Beet necrotic yellow vein virus detection. Journal of Virological Methods. 95(1-2). 163–169. 19 indexed citations
9.
Clover, G. R. G., et al.. (1999). First Report of Soilborne Wheat Mosaic Virus in the United Kingdom. Plant Disease. 83(9). 880–880. 9 indexed citations
10.
Barker, I., et al.. (1998). Potential Benefits of the Transgenic Control of Plant Viruses in the United Kingdom. Humana Press eBooks. 81. 557–566. 3 indexed citations
11.
Boonham, Neil, C. M. Henry, & K.R. Wood. (1998). The Characterization of a Subgenomic RNA and In Vitro Translation Products of Oat Chlorotic Stunt Virus. Virus Genes. 16(2). 141–145. 3 indexed citations
12.
Henry, C. M., et al.. (1996). The role of alternative hosts of Polymyxa betae in transmission of beet necrotic yellow vein virus (BNYVV) in England . Plant Pathology. 45(4). 662–666. 14 indexed citations
13.
Boonham, Neil, C. M. Henry, & K.R. Wood. (1995). The nucleotide sequence and proposed genome organization of oat chlorotic stunt virus, a new soil-borne virus of cereals. Journal of General Virology. 76(8). 2025–2034. 13 indexed citations
14.
Henry, C. M., et al.. (1995). Detection of beet necrotic yellow vein virus using reverse transcription and polymerase chain reaction. Journal of Virological Methods. 54(1). 15–28. 8 indexed citations
15.
Asher, M. J. C. & C. M. Henry. (1993). Research to contain beet rhizomania in the UK. 4 indexed citations
16.
Henry, C. M., et al.. (1992). A comparison, using dsRNA analysis, between beet soil-borne virus and some other tubular viruses isolated from sugar beet. Journal of General Virology. 73(5). 1317–1320. 9 indexed citations
17.
Henry, C. M., et al.. (1992). The effect of methyl bromide fumigation on rhizomania inoculum in the field. Plant Pathology. 41(4). 483–489. 5 indexed citations
18.
Henry, C. M., Richard A. Jones, & R. H. A. Coutts. (1986). Occurrence of a soil‐borne virus of sugar beet in England. Plant Pathology. 35(4). 585–591. 38 indexed citations
19.
Masters, Millicent, Barbara Newman, & C. M. Henry. (1984). Reduction of marker discrimination in transductional recombination. Molecular and General Genetics MGG. 196(1). 85–90. 10 indexed citations
20.
Henry, C. M. & J.W. Deacon. (1981). Natural (non-pathogenic) death of the cortex of wheat and barley seminal roots, as evidenced by nuclear staining with acridine orange. Plant and Soil. 60(2). 255–274. 88 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026