C. M. Espinoza

5.0k total citations
38 papers, 1.3k citations indexed

About

C. M. Espinoza is a scholar working on Astronomy and Astrophysics, Oceanography and Geophysics. According to data from OpenAlex, C. M. Espinoza has authored 38 papers receiving a total of 1.3k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 36 papers in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 17 papers in Oceanography and 10 papers in Geophysics. Recurrent topics in C. M. Espinoza's work include Pulsars and Gravitational Waves Research (29 papers), Geophysics and Gravity Measurements (17 papers) and Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae (8 papers). C. M. Espinoza is often cited by papers focused on Pulsars and Gravitational Waves Research (29 papers), Geophysics and Gravity Measurements (17 papers) and Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae (8 papers). C. M. Espinoza collaborates with scholars based in Chile, United Kingdom and United States. C. M. Espinoza's co-authors include A. G. Lyne, Nils Andersson, Wynn C. G. Ho, B. W. Stappers, M. Kramer, B. W. Stappers, A. G. Lyne, Danai Antonopoulou, Kostas Glampedakis and P. Weltevrede and has published in prestigious journals such as Physical Review Letters, The Astrophysical Journal and Neurology.

In The Last Decade

C. M. Espinoza

36 papers receiving 1.3k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
C. M. Espinoza Chile 17 1.3k 487 451 263 221 38 1.3k
G. H. Janssen Netherlands 24 2.2k 1.7× 388 0.8× 437 1.0× 627 2.4× 187 0.8× 49 2.3k
John Sarkissian Australia 17 2.1k 1.6× 334 0.7× 438 1.0× 505 1.9× 210 1.0× 49 2.1k
Sébastien Guillot France 23 1.8k 1.4× 548 1.1× 292 0.6× 406 1.5× 143 0.6× 85 1.9k
M. Bejger Poland 20 1.4k 1.1× 492 1.0× 287 0.6× 377 1.4× 151 0.7× 63 1.5k
A. Jessner Germany 22 1.5k 1.2× 245 0.5× 288 0.6× 468 1.8× 182 0.8× 63 1.6k
Mark Hobbs Australia 3 1.8k 1.4× 286 0.6× 299 0.7× 690 2.6× 142 0.6× 5 1.9k
B. Haskell Poland 25 1.7k 1.4× 785 1.6× 369 0.8× 258 1.0× 402 1.8× 64 1.8k
P. Weltevrede United Kingdom 27 2.1k 1.7× 447 0.9× 540 1.2× 721 2.7× 170 0.8× 95 2.2k
Bruno Giacomazzo Italy 25 2.3k 1.8× 365 0.7× 186 0.4× 617 2.3× 103 0.5× 48 2.3k
Kostas Glampedakis Germany 29 2.3k 1.8× 475 1.0× 259 0.6× 879 3.3× 286 1.3× 55 2.4k

Countries citing papers authored by C. M. Espinoza

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of C. M. Espinoza's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by C. M. Espinoza with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites C. M. Espinoza more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by C. M. Espinoza

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by C. M. Espinoza. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by C. M. Espinoza. The network helps show where C. M. Espinoza may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of C. M. Espinoza

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of C. M. Espinoza. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of C. M. Espinoza based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with C. M. Espinoza. C. M. Espinoza is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Espinoza, C. M., Danai Antonopoulou, Wynn C. G. Ho, et al.. (2025). PSR J0537–6910: Exponential recoveries detected for 12 glitches. Astronomy and Astrophysics. 706. A61–A61.
2.
Stepanova, M. V., et al.. (2024). The Response of the Magnetosphere to Changes in the Solar Wind Dynamic Pressure: 2. Ion and Electron Kappa Distribution Functions. Journal of Geophysical Research Space Physics. 129(7). 1 indexed citations
3.
Stepanova, M. V., et al.. (2024). The Response of the Earth Magnetosphere to Changes in the Solar Wind Dynamic Pressure: 1. Plasma and Magnetic Pressures. Journal of Geophysical Research Space Physics. 129(7). 1 indexed citations
4.
Espinoza, C. M., L. Kuiper, Wynn C. G. Ho, et al.. (2024). A Growing Braking Index and Spin-down Swings for the Pulsar PSR B0540–69. The Astrophysical Journal Letters. 973(2). L39–L39.
5.
García, Federico, et al.. (2024). Timing irregularities and glitches from the pulsar monitoring campaign at IAR. Astronomy and Astrophysics. 689. A191–A191. 6 indexed citations
6.
Yang, Jian, et al.. (2023). RCM Modeling of Bubble Injections Into the Inner Magnetosphere: Spectral Properties of Plasma Sheet Particles. Journal of Geophysical Research Space Physics. 128(4). 1 indexed citations
7.
Hu, Chin‐Ping, L. Kuiper, A. K. Harding, et al.. (2023). A NICER View on the 2020 Magnetar-like Outburst of PSR J1846−0258. The Astrophysical Journal. 952(2). 120–120. 7 indexed citations
8.
Ho, Wynn C. G., L. Kuiper, C. M. Espinoza, et al.. (2022). Timing Six Energetic Rotation-powered X-Ray Pulsars, Including the Fast-spinning Young PSR J0058-7218 and Big Glitcher PSR J0537-6910. The Astrophysical Journal. 939(1). 7–7. 13 indexed citations
9.
Antonopoulou, Danai, B. Haskell, & C. M. Espinoza. (2022). Pulsar glitches: observations and physical interpretation. Reports on Progress in Physics. 85(12). 126901–126901. 37 indexed citations
10.
Kirpichev, I. P., Е. Е. Антонова, M. V. Stepanova, et al.. (2021). Ion Kappa Distribution Parameters in the Magnetosphere of the Earth at Geocentric Distances Smaller Than 20 RE During Quiet Geomagnetic Conditions. Journal of Geophysical Research Space Physics. 126(10). 8 indexed citations
11.
Ho, Wynn C. G., Sébastien Guillot, P. M. Saz Parkinson, et al.. (2020). Proper motion, spectra, and timing of PSR J1813–1749 using Chandra and NICER. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 498(3). 4396–4403. 7 indexed citations
12.
Ho, Wynn C. G., C. M. Espinoza, Zaven Arzoumanian, et al.. (2020). Return of the Big Glitcher: NICER timing and glitches of PSR J0537−6910. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 498(4). 4605–4614. 24 indexed citations
13.
Espinoza, C. M., et al.. (2019). Glitch time series and size distributions in eight prolific pulsars. Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology). 28 indexed citations
14.
Espinoza, C. M., et al.. (2018). . Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology). 76 indexed citations
15.
Espinoza, C. M., A. G. Lyne, & B. W. Stappers. (2016). New long-term braking index measurements for glitching pulsars using a glitch-template method. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 466(1). 147–162. 49 indexed citations
16.
Lyne, A. G., C. A. Jordan, Francis Graham-Smith, et al.. (2014). 45 years of rotation of the Crab pulsar. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 446(1). 857–864. 143 indexed citations
17.
Espinoza, C. M., A. G. Lyne, B. W. Stappers, et al.. (2011). Glitches in the rotation of pulsars. AIP conference proceedings. 117–120. 2 indexed citations
18.
Espinoza, C. M., A. G. Lyne, M. Krämer, R. N. Manchester, & V. M. Kaspi. (2011). THE BRAKING INDEX OF PSR J1734–3333 AND THE MAGNETAR POPULATION. The Astrophysical Journal Letters. 741(1). L13–L13. 103 indexed citations
19.
Grondin, M.-H., S. Funk, M. Lemoine‐Goumard, et al.. (2011). DETECTION OF THE PULSAR WIND NEBULA HESS J1825–137 WITH THEFERMILARGE AREA TELESCOPE. The Astrophysical Journal. 738(1). 42–42. 27 indexed citations
20.
Espinoza, C. M., Christine Jordan, B. W. Stappers, et al.. (2010). Radio Timing of the Crab Pulsar during Recent Gamma-Ray Flare. The astronomer's telegram. 2889. 1. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026