Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Soft‐tissue sarcomas of adults; study of pathological prognostic variables and definition of a histopathological grading system
1984974 citationsM Trojani, F. Bonichon et al.International Journal of Cancerprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of C Lagarde's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by C Lagarde with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites C Lagarde more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by C Lagarde. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by C Lagarde. The network helps show where C Lagarde may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of C Lagarde
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of C Lagarde.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of C Lagarde based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with C Lagarde. C Lagarde is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Ranger‐Rogez, Sylvie, et al.. (1995). [Vaccination against hepatitis B virus. Value of intradermal administration in dialysed patients non responsive to intramuscular approach].. PubMed. 24(17). 803–6.6 indexed citations
Bonichon, F., Marion Durand, B Hœrni, & C Lagarde. (1982). [Prognosis of lymphosarcomas. Multivariate analysis in a series of 334 patients].. PubMed. 69(2). 149–58.1 indexed citations
10.
Brunet, R., et al.. (1982). Phase II study of sequential methotrexate-5-FU therapy in advanced measurable colorectal cancer.. PubMed. 66(7). 1563–5.13 indexed citations
11.
Chauvergne, J, et al.. (1982). [Treatment of inflammatory breast cancer. Controlled study of a combination therapy program].. PubMed. 58(32). 1813–9.1 indexed citations
12.
Richaud, Pierre, et al.. (1979). Total body irradiation (T.B.I.). Preliminary results of a new technique in 30 patients with hematologic malignancy.. PubMed. 155(11). 736–9.5 indexed citations
13.
Durand, M., J Chauvergne, Pierre Richaud, et al.. (1978). Chimiothérapie d'induction des lymphomes malins non hodgkiniens. Résultats d'un essai contrôlé comparant deux quadruples associations.. Acta Haematologica. 59(2).1 indexed citations
Lagarde, C, et al.. (1976). [Significance of chemotherapy complementary to radiotherapy in stages I and II in Hodgkin's disease].. PubMed. 62(1). 1–10.5 indexed citations
17.
Hœrni, B, J Chauvergne, & C Lagarde. (1969). Métastase intrathyroidienne d'un épithélioma à cellules claires du rein.. 45(2).1 indexed citations
18.
Lagarde, C, et al.. (1964). [EVALUATION OF 7 YEARS EXPERIENCE WITH ROTATORY ROENTGEN THERAPY OF CANCER OF THE ESOPHAGUS].. PubMed. 45. 732–5.1 indexed citations
19.
Lagarde, C, et al.. (1964). [PALLIATIVE TREATMENT OF CANCERS WITH THIO-TEPA. STUDY OF 115 CASES. VALUE IN BREAST CANCERS].. PubMed. 72. 2285–90.4 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.