C. L. Winder

480 total citations
11 papers, 342 citations indexed

About

C. L. Winder is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Social Psychology and Molecular Biology. According to data from OpenAlex, C. L. Winder has authored 11 papers receiving a total of 342 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 3 papers in Clinical Psychology, 2 papers in Social Psychology and 1 paper in Molecular Biology. Recurrent topics in C. L. Winder's work include Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications (2 papers), Retinal Development and Disorders (1 paper) and Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors Study (1 paper). C. L. Winder is often cited by papers focused on Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications (2 papers), Retinal Development and Disorders (1 paper) and Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors Study (1 paper). C. L. Winder collaborates with scholars based in United States and Australia. C. L. Winder's co-authors include Jerry S. Wiggins, Robert Kantor, Lucy Rau, Albert Bandura, T. J. Millar, Ian G. Morgan, Ichiro Ishimoto and Donna M. Gelfand and has published in prestigious journals such as Brain Research, The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease and Psychological Reports.

In The Last Decade

C. L. Winder

10 papers receiving 244 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
C. L. Winder United States	8	195	106	71	49	47	11	342
Leon J. Saul United States	12	285 1.5×	77 0.7×	18 0.3×	49 1.0×	62 1.3×	49	533
Gerald D. Klee United States	8	419 2.1×	108 1.0×	9 0.1×	36 0.7×	80 1.7×	14	605
Mabel Ross United States	6	184 0.9×	59 0.6×	33 0.5×	21 0.4×	15 0.3×	10	338
Robert A. Hogan United States	8	222 1.1×	90 0.8×	39 0.5×	40 0.8×	16 0.3×	16	438
Dan H. Buie United States	9	306 1.6×	111 1.0×	11 0.2×	107 2.2×	59 1.3×	14	479
Eugene Halpert United States	8	312 1.6×	89 0.8×	10 0.1×	51 1.0×	51 1.1×	20	568
William E. Broen United States	13	146 0.7×	63 0.6×	20 0.3×	183 3.7×	128 2.7×	22	513
Julius Wishner United States	10	107 0.5×	89 0.8×	12 0.2×	88 1.8×	49 1.0×	25	405
J. C. Read United Kingdom	3	144 0.7×	62 0.6×	10 0.1×	26 0.5×	15 0.3×	4	344
Anne‐Marie Sandler United Kingdom	12	345 1.8×	83 0.8×	13 0.2×	20 0.4×	54 1.1×	25	487

Countries citing papers authored by C. L. Winder

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of C. L. Winder's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by C. L. Winder with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites C. L. Winder more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by C. L. Winder

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by C. L. Winder. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by C. L. Winder. The network helps show where C. L. Winder may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of C. L. Winder

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of C. L. Winder. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of C. L. Winder based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with C. L. Winder. C. L. Winder is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

11 of 11 papers shown

1.

Millar, T. J., C. L. Winder, Ichiro Ishimoto, & Ian G. Morgan. (1988). Putative serotonergic bipolar and amacrine cells in the chicken retina. Brain Research. 439(1-2). 77–87. 29 indexed citations

2.

Winder, C. L. & Jerry S. Wiggins. (1964). Social reputation and social behavior: A further validation of the Peer Nomination Inventory.. Journal of Abnormal & Social Psychology. 68(6). 681–684. 17 indexed citations

3.

Winder, C. L., et al.. (1962). Dependency of patients, psychotherapists' responses, and aspects of psychotherapy.. Journal of Consulting Psychology. 26(2). 129–134. 39 indexed citations

4.

Winder, C. L. & Lucy Rau. (1962). Parental attitudes associated with social deviance in preadolescent boys.. Journal of Abnormal & Social Psychology. 64(6). 418–424. 43 indexed citations

5.

Wiggins, Jerry S. & C. L. Winder. (1961). The Peer Nomination Inventory: An Empirically Derived Sociometric Measure of Adjustment in Preadolescent Boys. Psychological Reports. 9(3). 643–677. 91 indexed citations

6.

Kantor, Robert & C. L. Winder. (1961). SCHIZOPHRENIA: CORRELATES OF LIFE HISTORY. The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease. 132(3). 221–226. 5 indexed citations

7.

Gelfand, Donna M. & C. L. Winder. (1961). Operant conditioning of verbal behavior of dysthymics and hysterics.. Journal of Abnormal & Social Psychology. 62(3). 688–689. 10 indexed citations

8.

Kantor, Robert & C. L. Winder. (1959). THE PROCESS-REACTIVE CONTINUUM. The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease. 129(5). 429–434. 11 indexed citations

9.

Winder, C. L. & Robert Kantor. (1958). Rorschach maturity scores of the mothers of schizophrenics.. Journal of Consulting Psychology. 22(6). 438–440. 7 indexed citations

10.

Winder, C. L., et al.. (1954). A STUDY OF PERSONALITY CORRELATES OF JUDGMENT BEHAVIOR. Defense Technical Information Center (DTIC). 1 indexed citations

11.

Kantor, Robert, et al.. (1953). Process and reactive schizophrenia.. Journal of Consulting Psychology. 17(3). 157–162. 89 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact