C. James Sung

427 total citations
10 papers, 345 citations indexed

About

C. James Sung is a scholar working on Obstetrics and Gynecology, Epidemiology and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health. According to data from OpenAlex, C. James Sung has authored 10 papers receiving a total of 345 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 5 papers in Obstetrics and Gynecology, 4 papers in Epidemiology and 3 papers in Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health. Recurrent topics in C. James Sung's work include Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies (3 papers), Birth, Development, and Health (2 papers) and Cervical Cancer and HPV Research (2 papers). C. James Sung is often cited by papers focused on Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies (3 papers), Birth, Development, and Health (2 papers) and Cervical Cancer and HPV Research (2 papers). C. James Sung collaborates with scholars based in United States and Brazil. C. James Sung's co-authors include Halit Pınar, Don B. Singer, Calvin E. Oyer, Lori A. Boardman, Jeffrey F. Peipert, Phinnara Has, Warren J. Huber, Paula M. Krueger, Surendra Sharma and David L. Gang and has published in prestigious journals such as Obstetrical & Gynecological Survey, Archiv für Pathologische Anatomie und Physiologie und für Klinische Medicin and American Journal of Reproductive Immunology.

In The Last Decade

C. James Sung

10 papers receiving 336 citations

Peers

C. James Sung

OG

PPCH

PRM

SURGE

PHEOH

Daisuke Tachibana Japan

Albana Cerekja Italy

Erdem Fadıloğlu Türkiye

Fang He China

Giovanni Piantelli Italy

Emin Üstünyurt Türkiye

Manaphat Suksai United States

Ran Svirsky Israel

Ratko Matijević Croatia

Anju Huria India

Daisuke Tachibana Japan

C. James Sung

145 ×0.6

OG

123 ×0.6

PPCH

33 ×0.6

PRM

68 ×1.3

SURGE

65 ×1.4

PHEOH

Citations per year, relative to C. James Sung C. James Sung (= 1×) peers Daisuke Tachibana

Countries citing papers authored by C. James Sung

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of C. James Sung's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by C. James Sung with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites C. James Sung more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by C. James Sung

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by C. James Sung. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by C. James Sung. The network helps show where C. James Sung may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of C. James Sung

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of C. James Sung. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of C. James Sung based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with C. James Sung. C. James Sung is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

10 of 10 papers shown

1.

Quddus, M. Ruhul, et al.. (2024). Endometrial endometrioid adenocarcinoma with a malignant squamous component: is the unusual metastatic pattern unique of these tumors?. Archiv für Pathologische Anatomie und Physiologie und für Klinische Medicin. 485(6). 1085–1094. 1 indexed citations

2.

McGuire, Patricia, Caroline Glicksman, Roger N. Wixtrom, et al.. (2022). Microbes, Histology, Blood Analysis, Enterotoxins, and Cytokines: Findings From the ASERF Systemic Symptoms in Women–Biospecimen Analysis Study: Part 3. Aesthetic Surgery Journal. 43(2). 230–244. 18 indexed citations

3.

Quddus, M. Ruhul, et al.. (2022). Comparison of Cervical HSIL Outcome between Pregnant and Non-Pregnant Women.. PubMed. 52(4). 544–555. 2 indexed citations

4.

Huber, Warren J., et al.. (2021). Do endometrial natural killer and regulatory T cells differ in infertile and clinical pregnancy patients? An analysis in patients undergoing frozen embryo transfer cycles. American Journal of Reproductive Immunology. 85(6). e13393–e13393. 15 indexed citations

5.

Larson, Lucia, et al.. (2008). A practical approach to using spot urine protein/creatinine ratios for assessing proteinuria in pregnancy. Obstetric Medicine. 1(1). 18–23. 3 indexed citations

6.

Boardman, Lori A., et al.. (2005). Atypical Squamous Cells of Undetermined Significance: Human Papillomavirus Testing in Adolescents. Obstetrical & Gynecological Survey. 60(7). 435–437. 4 indexed citations

7.

Oyer, Calvin E., et al.. (2004). Reference Values for Valve Circumferences and Ventricular Wall Thicknesses of Fetal and Neonatal Hearts. Pediatric and Developmental Pathology. 7(5). 499–505. 16 indexed citations

8.

Pınar, Halit, Don B. Singer, Theonia K. Boyd, et al.. (2002). Triplet Placentas: Reference Values for Weights. Pediatric and Developmental Pathology. 5(5). 495–498. 15 indexed citations

9.

Peipert, Jeffrey F., Lori A. Boardman, & C. James Sung. (1997). Performance of Clinical and Laparoscopic Criteria for the Diagnosis of Upper Genital Tract Infection. Infectious Diseases in Obstetrics and Gynecology. 5(4). 291–296. 15 indexed citations

10.

Pınar, Halit, C. James Sung, Calvin E. Oyer, & Don B. Singer. (1996). Reference Values for Singleton and Twin Placental Weights. Pediatric Pathology & Laboratory Medicine. 16(6). 901–907. 256 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact