C. Heien

441 total citations
8 papers, 319 citations indexed

About

C. Heien is a scholar working on Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Obstetrics and Gynecology and Epidemiology. According to data from OpenAlex, C. Heien has authored 8 papers receiving a total of 319 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 6 papers in Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, 6 papers in Obstetrics and Gynecology and 4 papers in Epidemiology. Recurrent topics in C. Heien's work include Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions (5 papers), Maternal and fetal healthcare (3 papers) and Preterm Birth and Chorioamnionitis (3 papers). C. Heien is often cited by papers focused on Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions (5 papers), Maternal and fetal healthcare (3 papers) and Preterm Birth and Chorioamnionitis (3 papers). C. Heien collaborates with scholars based in Norway, United States and Germany. C. Heien's co-authors include Torbjørn Moe Eggebø, Pål Romundstad, Inger Økland, Leif Gjessing, Kjell Å. Salvesen, K. Å. Salvesen, Christian Lycke Ellingsen and P. R. Romundstad and has published in prestigious journals such as Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology, Obstetrical & Gynecological Survey and Acta Obstetricia Et Gynecologica Scandinavica.

In The Last Decade

C. Heien

7 papers receiving 313 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
C. Heien Norway 6 271 174 131 115 66 8 319
Leif Gjessing Norway 9 337 1.2× 227 1.3× 169 1.3× 131 1.1× 76 1.2× 18 393
Wassim A. Hassan United Kingdom 10 274 1.0× 202 1.2× 74 0.6× 115 1.0× 71 1.1× 16 334
E. Torkildsen Norway 9 399 1.5× 280 1.6× 177 1.4× 161 1.4× 115 1.7× 14 489
Meenakshi Ramphul Ireland 9 224 0.8× 169 1.0× 58 0.4× 57 0.5× 45 0.7× 17 255
L. Cariello Italy 10 205 0.8× 121 0.7× 102 0.8× 153 1.3× 114 1.7× 15 303
Benjamin D. Byers United States 7 180 0.7× 140 0.8× 90 0.7× 17 0.1× 111 1.7× 14 308
Elisabeth Peregrine United Kingdom 7 224 0.8× 209 1.2× 88 0.7× 28 0.2× 38 0.6× 10 288
I. Cataneo Italy 8 93 0.3× 66 0.4× 56 0.4× 83 0.7× 77 1.2× 15 178
M. O. Thompson United Kingdom 5 235 0.9× 162 0.9× 131 1.0× 26 0.2× 49 0.7× 10 311
Derita Bran United States 9 85 0.3× 140 0.8× 259 2.0× 44 0.4× 52 0.8× 11 381

Countries citing papers authored by C. Heien

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of C. Heien's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by C. Heien with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites C. Heien more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by C. Heien

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by C. Heien. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by C. Heien. The network helps show where C. Heien may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of C. Heien

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of C. Heien. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of C. Heien based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with C. Heien. C. Heien is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

8 of 8 papers shown
1.
Heien, C., et al.. (2015). Umbilical vein vasomotion detectedin vivoby serial three-dimensional pixelwise spatially angle-corrected volume flow measurements. Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology. 47(5). 623–628. 2 indexed citations
2.
Eggebø, Torbjørn Moe, et al.. (2012). Routine Use of Color Doppler in Fetal Heart Scanning in a Low-Risk Population. ISRN Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2012. 1–7. 8 indexed citations
3.
Eggebø, Torbjørn Moe, Inger Økland, C. Heien, et al.. (2009). Can ultrasound measurements replace digitally assessed elements of the Bishop score?. Acta Obstetricia Et Gynecologica Scandinavica. 88(3). 325–331. 46 indexed citations
4.
Eggebø, Torbjørn Moe, et al.. (2009). Can Ultrasound Measurements Replace Digitally Assessed Elements of the Bishop Score?. Obstetrical & Gynecological Survey. 64(7). 443–445. 5 indexed citations
5.
Eggebø, Torbjørn Moe, C. Heien, Inger Økland, et al.. (2008). Ultrasound assessment of fetal head–perineum distance before induction of labor. Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology. 32(2). 199–204. 82 indexed citations
6.
Eggebø, Torbjørn Moe, C. Heien, Inger Økland, et al.. (2007). Prediction of Labour and Delivery by Ascertaining the Fetal Head Position with Transabdominal Ultrasound in Pregnancies with Prelabour Rupture of Membranes after 37 weeks. Ultraschall in der Medizin - European Journal of Ultrasound. 29(2). 179–183. 27 indexed citations
7.
Eggebø, Torbjørn Moe, Leif Gjessing, Inger Økland, et al.. (2007). OC191: Ultrasound measurements of fetal head‐engagement and cervical length as predictive factors of labor outcome in women with induced labor. Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology. 30(4). 425–426. 1 indexed citations
8.
Eggebø, Torbjørn Moe, Leif Gjessing, C. Heien, et al.. (2006). Prediction of labor and delivery by transperineal ultrasound in pregnancies with prelabor rupture of membranes at term. Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology. 27(4). 387–391. 148 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026