C. F. Petersen
- Geophysics top 10%
- Mechanics of Materials top 10%
- Materials Chemistry
- Astronomy and Astrophysics
- Civil and Structural Engineering
- Co-authors
- J. T. RosenbergThomas J. AhrensD. A. ShockeyDonald R. CurranL. SeamanW. J. MurriM. CowperthwaiteG.D. Anderson
- Topics
- Geotechnical and Geomechanical Engineering (3 papers)Rock Mechanics and Modeling (3 papers)High-pressure geophysics and materials (3 papers)
- Journals
- Journal of Geophysical Research AtmospheresJournal of Applied PhysicsInternational Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences & Geomechanics Abstracts
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
C. F. Petersen
8 papers receiving 277 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 45
- Geophysics 174
- Mechanics of Materials 128
- Materials Chemistry 118
- Astronomy and Astrophysics 49
- Civil and Structural Engineering 46
Countries citing papers authored by C. F. Petersen
This map shows the geographic impact of C. F. Petersen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by C. F. Petersen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites C. F. Petersen more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by C. F. Petersen
This network shows the impact of papers produced by C. F. Petersen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by C. F. Petersen. The network helps show where C. F. Petersen may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of C. F. Petersen
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of C. F. Petersen. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of C. F. Petersen based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with C. F. Petersen. C. F. Petersen is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Dynamic properties of rock required for prediction calculations | 0 |
| 2 | 127 | |
| 3 | Dynamic Tensile Failure in Rocks | 2 |
| 4 | Response of Solids to Shock Waves. | 1 |
| 5 | 19 | |
| 6 | 13 | |
| 7 | 136 | |
| 8 | 12 | |
| 9 | DYNAMIC PROPERTIES OF ROCKS | 11 |
About C. F. Petersen
C. F. Petersen is a scholar working on Geophysics, Biophysics and Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes, having authored 9 papers that have together received 321 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Geotechnical and Geomechanical Engineering (3 papers), Rock Mechanics and Modeling (3 papers) and High-pressure geophysics and materials (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Geophysics (174 citations), Mechanics of Materials (128 citations) and Ceramics and Composites (18 citations). C. F. Petersen has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include J. T. Rosenberg, Thomas J. Ahrens, D. A. Shockey, Donald R. Curran, L. Seaman, W. J. Murri, M. Cowperthwaite and G.D. Anderson. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres, Journal of Applied Physics and International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences & Geomechanics Abstracts.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.