C E Inturrisi
- Physiology top 10%
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience top 10%
- Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine top 2%
- Molecular Biology
- Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health top 10%
- Co-authors
- Juei‐Tang ChengKathleen M. FoleyPaul J. TiseoGavril W. PasternakMegumi ShimoyamaNaohito ShimoyamaKathryn ElliottAda G. Rogers
- Topics
- Pain Mechanisms and Treatments (8 papers)Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (4 papers)Pain Management and Opioid Use (3 papers)
- Journals
- NeurologyBrain ResearchPain
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
C E Inturrisi
18 papers receiving 580 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 68
- Physiology 285
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 224
- Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 209
- Molecular Biology 142
- Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 140
Countries citing papers authored by C E Inturrisi
This map shows the geographic impact of C E Inturrisi's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by C E Inturrisi with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites C E Inturrisi more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by C E Inturrisi
This network shows the impact of papers produced by C E Inturrisi. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by C E Inturrisi. The network helps show where C E Inturrisi may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of C E Inturrisi
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of C E Inturrisi. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of C E Inturrisi based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with C E Inturrisi. C E Inturrisi is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 7 | |
| 2 | 14 | |
| 3 | 183 | |
| 4 | 6 | |
| 5 | 60 | |
| 6 | 86 | |
| 7 | 40 | |
| 8 | 3 | |
| 9 | I.v. infusion of opioids for cancer pain: clinical review and guidelines for use. | 62 |
| 10 | 0 | |
| 11 | 42 | |
| 12 | Levorphanol: pharmacokinetics and steady-state plasma concentrations in patients with pain. | 17 |
| 13 | 4 | |
| 14 | Levorphanol: a simplified radioimmunoassay for clinical use. | 2 |
| 15 | 9 | |
| 16 | Levorphanol:radioimmunoassay and plasma concentration profiles in dog and man. | 2 |
| 17 | 12 | |
| 18 | 35 | |
| 19 | 26 |
About C E Inturrisi
C E Inturrisi is a scholar working on Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and Physiology, having authored 19 papers that have together received 610 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pain Mechanisms and Treatments (8 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (4 papers) and Pain Management and Opioid Use (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (209 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (224 citations) and Physiology (285 citations). C E Inturrisi has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Juei‐Tang Cheng, Kathleen M. Foley, Paul J. Tiseo, Gavril W. Pasternak, Megumi Shimoyama, Naohito Shimoyama, Kathryn Elliott, Ada G. Rogers, R. Portenoy and Dwight E. Moulin. Their work appears in journals such as Neurology, Brain Research and Pain.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.