C. B. CARPENTER

918 total citations
10 papers, 737 citations indexed

About

C. B. CARPENTER is a scholar working on Surgery, Immunology and Transplantation. According to data from OpenAlex, C. B. CARPENTER has authored 10 papers receiving a total of 737 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 6 papers in Surgery, 6 papers in Immunology and 5 papers in Transplantation. Recurrent topics in C. B. CARPENTER's work include Renal Transplantation Outcomes and Treatments (5 papers), T-cell and B-cell Immunology (4 papers) and Immune Cell Function and Interaction (4 papers). C. B. CARPENTER is often cited by papers focused on Renal Transplantation Outcomes and Treatments (5 papers), T-cell and B-cell Immunology (4 papers) and Immune Cell Function and Interaction (4 papers). C. B. CARPENTER collaborates with scholars based in United States. C. B. CARPENTER's co-authors include M H Sayegh, Stephen I. Alexander, Barbara Murphy, John P. Vella, William Harmon, Mônica Siqueira Ferreira, T. B. STROM, Samia J. Khoury, Wayne W. Hancock and Howard L. Weiner and has published in prestigious journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Journal of Clinical Investigation and Gastroenterology.

In The Last Decade

C. B. CARPENTER

10 papers receiving 681 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
C. B. CARPENTER United States 10 410 293 291 64 64 10 737
P. S. Russell United States 9 239 0.6× 237 0.8× 243 0.8× 71 1.1× 135 2.1× 19 620
Lauro Vasconcellos United States 4 198 0.5× 276 0.9× 234 0.8× 87 1.4× 111 1.7× 6 536
J Peña United Kingdom 6 313 0.8× 202 0.7× 367 1.3× 54 0.8× 103 1.6× 10 779
Chantal Eijsink Netherlands 12 314 0.8× 255 0.9× 155 0.5× 64 1.0× 105 1.6× 16 596
van Rood Jj Netherlands 14 302 0.7× 148 0.5× 102 0.4× 44 0.7× 72 1.1× 70 625
Constanze Schoenemann Germany 9 165 0.4× 228 0.8× 192 0.7× 60 0.9× 90 1.4× 17 453
Andrew L. Lobashevsky United States 17 258 0.6× 518 1.8× 416 1.4× 79 1.2× 151 2.4× 41 869
Cora Dejelo United States 5 625 1.5× 641 2.2× 346 1.2× 46 0.7× 303 4.7× 5 1.1k
Jean-Paul Soulillou France 6 181 0.4× 192 0.7× 131 0.5× 76 1.2× 106 1.7× 7 439
H Bitter-Suermann Canada 14 80 0.2× 262 0.9× 367 1.3× 57 0.9× 102 1.6× 58 656

Countries citing papers authored by C. B. CARPENTER

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of C. B. CARPENTER's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by C. B. CARPENTER with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites C. B. CARPENTER more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by C. B. CARPENTER

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by C. B. CARPENTER. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by C. B. CARPENTER. The network helps show where C. B. CARPENTER may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of C. B. CARPENTER

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of C. B. CARPENTER. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of C. B. CARPENTER based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with C. B. CARPENTER. C. B. CARPENTER is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

10 of 10 papers shown
1.
Murphy, Barbara, Colm Magee, Stephen I. Alexander, et al.. (1999). Inhibition of allorecognition by a human class II MHC–derived peptide through the induction of apoptosis. Journal of Clinical Investigation. 103(6). 859–867. 29 indexed citations
2.
Vella, John P., Mônica Siqueira Ferreira, Barbara Murphy, et al.. (1997). INDIRECT ALLORECOGNITION OF MAJOR HISTOCOMPATIBILITY COMPLEX ALLOPEPTIDES IN HUMAN RENAL TRANSPLANT RECIPIENTS WITH CHRONIC GRAFT DYSFUNCTION1. Transplantation. 64(6). 795–800. 229 indexed citations
3.
Gallon, Lorenzo, Bruno Watschinger, Barbara Murphy, et al.. (1995). THE INDIRECT PATHWAY OF ALLORECOGNITION. Transplantation. 59(4). 612–616. 68 indexed citations
4.
Sayegh, Mohamed H., et al.. (1994). Rat intestinal epithelial cells present major histocompatibility complex allopeptides to primed T cells. Gastroenterology. 107(5). 1537–1542. 30 indexed citations
5.
Sayegh, M H, Samia J. Khoury, Wayne W. Hancock, Howard L. Weiner, & C. B. CARPENTER. (1992). Induction of immunity and oral tolerance with polymorphic class II major histocompatibility complex allopeptides in the rat.. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 89(16). 7762–7766. 128 indexed citations
6.
Tilney, N. L., et al.. (1979). REJECTED HUMAN RENAL ALLOGRAFTS RECOVERY AND CHARACTERISTICS OF INFILTRATING CELLS AND ANTIBODY. Transplantation. 28(5). 421–426. 40 indexed citations
7.
8.
STROM, T. B., C. B. CARPENTER, Marvin R. Garovoy, et al.. (1975). MODIFICATION OF THE RAT ALLOIMMUNE RESPONSE BY ENHANCING ANTIBODIES AND THE ROLE OF BLOCKING FACTORS IN THE SURVIVAL OF RENAL GRAFTS. Transplantation. 20(5). 368–380. 19 indexed citations
9.
Rd, Guttmann, et al.. (1967). RENAL TRANSPLANTATION IN THE INBRED RAT. Transplantation. 5(4). 668–668. 107 indexed citations
10.
Rd, Guttmann, C. B. CARPENTER, R R Lindquist, & John P. Merrill. (1967). TREATMENT WITH HETEROLOGOUS ANTITHYMUS SERA. Transplantation. 5(Supplement). 1115–1120. 14 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026