C. Aimé

2.0k citations
116 papers · 1.4k indexed · h-index 20

C. Aimé

105 papers receiving 1.3k citations

Peers

C. Aimé
Comparison fields: 5 of 61
  • Instrumentation 312
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics 706
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 857
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 266
  • Computational Mathematics 6
Replace Donald T. Gavel with:
Donald T. Gavel United States
David F. Buscher United Kingdom
Rémi Soummer United States
Julian C. Christou United States
A. Labeyrie France
J. Kent Wallace United States
Gérard Rousset France
G. A. Chanan United States
Peter Wizinowich United States
Erez N. Ribak Israel
C. Aimé relative to Donald T. Gavel United States Donald T. Gavel's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Donald T. Gavel · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by C. Aimé

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of C. Aimé's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by C. Aimé with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites C. Aimé more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by C. Aimé

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by C. Aimé. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by C. Aimé. The network helps show where C. Aimé may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside C. Aimé, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with C. Aimé Line = papers co-authored together C. Aimé links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20240
2 201612
3 20144
4 201019
5 200919
6 20075
7 200711
8 20074
9 20076
10 200525
11 200395
12
Astronomy with high contrast imaging : from planetary systems to active galactic nuclei
20033
13 200396
14 200287
15 200127
16
ISRA and RL Algorithms Used for Deconvolution of AO and HST Images
19991
17 199721
18 19975
19
Image Reconstruction Using a Slit Aperture Telescope with Partial Atmospheric Corrections
19921
20 19823

About C. Aimé

C. Aimé is a scholar working on Instrumentation, Astronomy and Astrophysics and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, having authored 116 papers that have together received 1.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Adaptive optics and wavefront sensing (64 papers), Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies (35 papers), Optical measurement and interference techniques (24 papers), Calibration and Measurement Techniques (21 papers), Optical Polarization and Ellipsometry (19 papers), Astronomy and Astrophysical Research (16 papers), Solar and Space Plasma Dynamics (15 papers) and Infrared Target Detection Methodologies (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Instrumentation (312 citations), Astronomy and Astrophysics (706 citations) and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (857 citations). C. Aimé has collaborated with scholars based in France, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Rémi Soummer, G. Ricort, H. Lantéri, A. Ferrari, Muriel Roche, André Ferrari, É. Aristidi, Kjetil Dohlen, Laurent Jolıssaınt and F. Roddier. Their work appears in journals such as Astronomy and Astrophysics, Optics Communications, Pure and Applied Optics Journal of the European Optical Society Part A, The Astrophysical Journal and Journal of the Optical Society of America A.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026