Bum‐Joo Cho

1.7k citations
63 papers · 1.2k · h-index 21

Impact in

Papers in

Bum‐Joo Cho

58 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers

Bum‐Joo Cho
Comparison fields: 5 of 115
  • Health Informatics 55
  • Ophthalmology 347
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 507
  • Otorhinolaryngology 59
  • Oncology 229
Replace Andrea L. Kossler with:
Andrea L. Kossler United States
Francesco Garaci Italy
Se Jin Cho South Korea
Argye Hillis United States
Hitoshi Tabuchi Japan
Ein Oh South Korea
Walter C. Jean United States
David A. Froehling United States
Houman Sotoudeh United States
Bum‐Joo Cho relative to Andrea L. Kossler United States Andrea L. Kossler's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Andrea L. Kossler · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Bum‐Joo Cho

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Bum‐Joo Cho's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Bum‐Joo Cho with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Bum‐Joo Cho more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Bum‐Joo Cho

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Bum‐Joo Cho. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Bum‐Joo Cho. The network helps show where Bum‐Joo Cho may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Bum‐Joo Cho, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Bum‐Joo Cho Line = papers co-authored together Bum‐Joo Cho links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 63 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2019115
2 202082
3 202070
4 201562
5 201959
6 201359
7 202045
8 201841
9 201941
10 202040
11 201438
12 201835
13 201231
14 201927
15 202227
16 201926
17 201823
18 201923
19 202022
20 201421

About Bum‐Joo Cho

Bum‐Joo Cho is a scholar working on Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Ophthalmology, Surgery, Oncology and Epidemiology, having authored 63 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Retinal Diseases and Treatments (16 papers), Glaucoma and retinal disorders (15 papers), Retinal Imaging and Analysis (10 papers), Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging (7 papers), Ocular Surface and Contact Lens (6 papers), Retinal and Optic Conditions (6 papers), AI in cancer detection (6 papers) and Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health Informatics (55 citations), Ophthalmology (347 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (507 citations), Otorhinolaryngology (59 citations) and Oncology (229 citations). Bum‐Joo Cho has collaborated with scholars based in South Korea, Nigeria and United States. Frequent co-authors include Hyeong Gon Yu, Chang Seok Bang, Yong Joon Suh, Eun Hye Jung, Hum Chung, Jang Won Heo, Joo Young Shin, Ju Han Kim, Dong‐Kyu Kim and Jae Jun Lee. Their work appears in journals such as Scientific Reports, Journal of Clinical Medicine, Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, Retina and Eye.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact