Buffy S. Ellsworth
- Molecular Biology
- Genetics top 5%
- Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism top 5%
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health top 10%
- Reproductive Medicine top 5%
- Co-authors
- Sally A. CamperColin M. ClayMichelle L. BrinkmeierDawn L. DuvalKenneth EscuderoScott E. NelsonShannon W. DavisAmanda H. Mortensen
- Topics
- FOXO transcription factor regulation (10 papers)Growth Hormone and Insulin-like Growth Factors (10 papers)Reproductive Biology and Fertility (8 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesFranceJapan
In The Last Decade
Buffy S. Ellsworth
28 papers receiving 920 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 74
- Molecular Biology 571
- Genetics 345
- Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism 294
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 176
- Reproductive Medicine 136
Countries citing papers authored by Buffy S. Ellsworth
This map shows the geographic impact of Buffy S. Ellsworth's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Buffy S. Ellsworth with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Buffy S. Ellsworth more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Buffy S. Ellsworth
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Buffy S. Ellsworth. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Buffy S. Ellsworth. The network helps show where Buffy S. Ellsworth may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Buffy S. Ellsworth
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Buffy S. Ellsworth. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Buffy S. Ellsworth based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Buffy S. Ellsworth. Buffy S. Ellsworth is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 5 | |
| 3 | 4 | |
| 4 | 2 | |
| 5 | 5 | |
| 6 | 105 | |
| 7 | 9 | |
| 8 | 10 | |
| 9 | 14 | |
| 10 | 5 | |
| 11 | 3 | |
| 12 | 85 | |
| 13 | 11 | |
| 14 | 11 | |
| 15 | 10 | |
| 16 | 20 | |
| 17 | 23 | |
| 18 | 117 | |
| 19 | 6 | |
| 20 | 114 |
About Buffy S. Ellsworth
Buffy S. Ellsworth is a scholar working on Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Aging and Reproductive Medicine, having authored 29 papers that have together received 937 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include FOXO transcription factor regulation (10 papers), Growth Hormone and Insulin-like Growth Factors (10 papers) and Reproductive Biology and Fertility (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism (294 citations), Reproductive Medicine (136 citations) and Genetics (345 citations). Buffy S. Ellsworth has collaborated with scholars based in United States, France and Japan. Frequent co-authors include Sally A. Camper, Colin M. Clay, Michelle L. Brinkmeier, Dawn L. Duval, Kenneth Escudero, Scott E. Nelson, Shannon W. Davis, Amanda H. Mortensen, Noboru Egashira and Alexandre Z. Daly. Their work appears in journals such as PLoS ONE, Endocrinology and Developmental Biology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.