Buelent Koektuerk
-
- Cardiac Arrhythmias and Treatments 24
- Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes 23
- Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias 13
- Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies 7
- Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors 2
- Internal Medicine top 5%
- Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management 3
-
- Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics 2
-
- Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices 2
Buelent Koektuerk
28 papers receiving 823 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 45
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 800
- Internal Medicine 80
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 35
- Surgery 54
- Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 6
Countries citing papers authored by Buelent Koektuerk
This map shows the geographic impact of Buelent Koektuerk's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Buelent Koektuerk with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Buelent Koektuerk more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Buelent Koektuerk
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Buelent Koektuerk. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Buelent Koektuerk. The network helps show where Buelent Koektuerk may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Buelent Koektuerk, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2022 | 1 | |
| 2 | 2021 | 3 | |
| 3 | 2021 | 5 | |
| 4 | 2021 | 1 | |
| 5 | 2019 | 1 | |
| 6 | 2017 | 10 | |
| 7 | 2016 | 4 | |
| 8 | 2016 | 25 | |
| 9 | 2011 | 26 | |
| 10 | 2011 | 11 | |
| 11 | 2010 | 78 | |
| 12 | 2010 | 67 | |
| 13 | 2010 | 88 | |
| 14 | 2010 | 26 | |
| 15 | 2009 | 7 | |
| 16 | 2009 | 5 | |
| 17 | Abstract 2253: Left Atrial Appendage Function And Clinical Outcome After Electrical Isolation Of Left Atrial Appendage In Patients Undergoing Atrial Fibrillation Ablation | 2008 | 3 |
| 18 | 2008 | 12 | |
| 19 | 2008 | 265 | |
| 20 | 2008 | 40 |
About Buelent Koektuerk
Buelent Koektuerk is a scholar working on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Internal Medicine and Gastroenterology, having authored 28 papers that have together received 837 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cardiac Arrhythmias and Treatments (24 papers), Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes (23 papers), Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias (13 papers), Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies (7 papers), Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management (3 papers), Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices (2 papers), Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics (2 papers) and Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (800 citations), Internal Medicine (80 citations) and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (35 citations). Buelent Koektuerk has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United Kingdom and Türkiye. Frequent co-authors include Roland Richard Tilz, Feifan Ouyang, K. R. Julian Chun, Matthias Antz, Thomas Zerm, Melanie Konstantinidou, Boris Schmidt, K.-H. Kuck, Andreas Metzner and Andreas Metzner. Their work appears in journals such as Circulation, PLoS ONE and European Heart Journal.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.