Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Modified Grey Wolf Optimizer for Global Engineering Optimization
2016307 citationsNitin Mittal, Urvinder Singh et al.profile →
Image denoising review: From classical to state-of-the-art approaches
2019289 citationsBhawna Goyal, Ayush Dogra et al.profile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of B.S. Sohi's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by B.S. Sohi with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites B.S. Sohi more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by B.S. Sohi. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by B.S. Sohi. The network helps show where B.S. Sohi may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of B.S. Sohi
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of B.S. Sohi.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of B.S. Sohi based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with B.S. Sohi. B.S. Sohi is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Agrawal, Sunil & B.S. Sohi. (2011). Generalization and optimization of feature set for accurate identification of P2P Traffic in the internet using neural network. WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on COMMUNICATIONS archive. 10(2). 55–65.4 indexed citations
13.
Kumar, Amod, et al.. (2010). Active marker based kinematic and spatio-temporal gait measurement system using LabVIEW vision. Journal of Scientific & Industrial Research. 69(8). 600–605.7 indexed citations
14.
Kumar, Amod, et al.. (2009). Evaluation of normal Gait using electro-goniometer. Journal of Scientific & Industrial Research. 68(8). 696–698.5 indexed citations
15.
Sohi, B.S., et al.. (1980). Chemical Control of the Oriental Citrus Mite, Eutetranychus Orientalis (Klein) (Acarine: Tetranychidae) in the Punjab. Indian Journal of Horticulture. 37(3). 322–325.1 indexed citations
16.
Sohi, B.S., et al.. (1975). Effectiveness of insecticidal sprays against grape-vine Cicadellid, Arboridia (Arborifera) vini ferata Sohi and Sandhu in the Punjab (India). Indian Journal of Horticulture. 32. 68–70.1 indexed citations
17.
Sohi, B.S., et al.. (1974). Comparative Effectiveness of Different Insecticides for the Control of the Grape-Vine Leafroller, Sylepta Lunalis Guen. (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae), in the Punjab, India1. Indian Journal of Horticulture. 31(4). 389–392.1 indexed citations
18.
Sohi, B.S., et al.. (1974). A Note on Control of the Mango Mealy-Bug in the Punjab1. Indian Journal of Horticulture. 31(1). 102–103.2 indexed citations
19.
Sohi, B.S., et al.. (1972). A New Record of Coccotrypes Dactyliperda F. (Scolytidae: Coleoptera) As A Pest of Date-Palm in the Punjab. Indian Journal of Horticulture. 29. 351–352.1 indexed citations
20.
Sohi, B.S., et al.. (1970). Indexing the Genetic Stock of Different Species of Citrus Against Citrus Leaf Miner and Citrus Psylla. Indian Journal of Horticulture. 27. 76–79.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.