Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
From the Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm to a Quantum Alternating Operator Ansatz
2019431 citationsStuart Hadfield, Zhihui Wang et al.Algorithmsprofile →
Unbiasing fermionic quantum Monte Carlo with a quantum computer
2022142 citationsWilliam J. Huggins, Bryan O’Gorman et al.Natureprofile →
Author Peers
Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields.
citations ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by Bryan O’Gorman
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Bryan O’Gorman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Bryan O’Gorman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Bryan O’Gorman more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Bryan O’Gorman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Bryan O’Gorman. The network helps show where Bryan O’Gorman may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Bryan O’Gorman
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Bryan O’Gorman.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Bryan O’Gorman based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Bryan O’Gorman. Bryan O’Gorman is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Huggins, William J., Bryan O’Gorman, Nicholas C. Rubin, et al.. (2022). Unbiasing fermionic quantum Monte Carlo with a quantum computer. Nature. 603(7901). 416–420.142 indexed citations breakdown →
Hadfield, Stuart, Zhihui Wang, Bryan O’Gorman, et al.. (2019). From the Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm to a Quantum Alternating Operator Ansatz. Algorithms. 12(2). 34–34.431 indexed citations breakdown →
9.
Grabbe, Shon, Eleanor Rieffel, Stuart Hadfield, et al.. (2019). Overview of NASA QuAIL Team Research. NASA Technical Reports Server (NASA).1 indexed citations
Tran, Tony, Zhihui Wang, N. Minh, et al.. (2016). Explorations of Quantum-Classical Approaches to Scheduling a Mars Lander Activity Problem. National Conference on Artificial Intelligence.4 indexed citations
Perdomo‐Ortiz, Alejandro, et al.. (2015). Programming and Tuning a Quantum Annealing Device to Solve Real World Problems. Bulletin of the American Physical Society. 2015.1 indexed citations
17.
O’Gorman, Bryan, Eleanor Rieffel, N. Minh, Davide Venturelli, & Jeremy Frank. (2015). Compiling Planning into Quantum Optimization Problems: A Comparative Study.3 indexed citations
18.
O’Gorman, Bryan, Ryan Babbush, Alejandro Perdomo‐Ortiz, Alán Aspuru‐Guzik, & Vadim Smelyanskiy. (2015). Bayesian network structure learning using quantum annealing. The European Physical Journal Special Topics. 224(1). 163–188.54 indexed citations
Babbush, Ryan, Alejandro Perdomo‐Ortiz, Bryan O’Gorman, William G. Macready, & Alán Aspuru‐Guzik. (2012). Construction of Energy Functions for Lattice Heteropolymer Models: Efficient Encodings for Constraint Satisfaction Programming and Quantum Annealing. arXiv (Cornell University).2 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.