Bruno Barberis
- Epidemiology
- Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine top 10%
- Surgery
- Emergency Medicine
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
- Co-authors
- Sergio LivigniGilberto FioreClaudia FilippiniYasser SakrSilvano CardellinoLuciana MasciaV. Marco RanieriEmanuela Lovato
- Topics
- Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment (3 papers)Nosocomial Infections in ICU (2 papers)Bacterial Identification and Susceptibility Testing (1 paper)
In The Last Decade
Bruno Barberis
7 papers receiving 239 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 68
- Epidemiology 147
- Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 46
- Surgery 44
- Emergency Medicine 35
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 30
Countries citing papers authored by Bruno Barberis
This map shows the geographic impact of Bruno Barberis's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Bruno Barberis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Bruno Barberis more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Bruno Barberis
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Bruno Barberis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Bruno Barberis. The network helps show where Bruno Barberis may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Bruno Barberis
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Bruno Barberis. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Bruno Barberis based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Bruno Barberis. Bruno Barberis is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 124 | |
| 2 | Epidemiology and outcome of sepsis syndromes in Italian ICUs: a muticentre, observational cohort study in the region of Piedmont. | 38 |
| 3 | 21 | |
| 4 | 41 | |
| 5 | 5 | |
| 6 | SPIR01 and SPIR02: a two-year 1-day point prevalence multicenter study of infections in intensive care units in Piedmont, Italy. | 2 |
| 7 | Measuring complexity/level of care and appropriateness of resource use in intensive care units. | 10 |
About Bruno Barberis
Bruno Barberis is a scholar working on Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine and Geriatrics and Gerontology, having authored 7 papers that have together received 241 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment (3 papers), Nosocomial Infections in ICU (2 papers) and Bacterial Identification and Susceptibility Testing (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (46 citations), Family Practice (11 citations) and Epidemiology (147 citations). Bruno Barberis has collaborated with scholars based in Italy and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Sergio Livigni, Gilberto Fiore, Claudia Filippini, Yasser Sakr, Silvano Cardellino, Luciana Mascia, V. Marco Ranieri, V. Marco Ranieri, Emanuela Lovato and Fabrizio Bert. Their work appears in journals such as Critical Care, Journal of Critical Care and Emergency Medicine Journal.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.