Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
This map shows the geographic impact of Bruce Meyer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Bruce Meyer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Bruce Meyer more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Bruce Meyer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Bruce Meyer. The network helps show where Bruce Meyer may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Bruce Meyer
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Bruce Meyer.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Bruce Meyer based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Bruce Meyer. Bruce Meyer is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Celhay, Pablo, Bruce Meyer, & Nikolas Mittag. (2025). Stigma in Welfare Programs. The Review of Economics and Statistics. 1–37.
Meyer, Bruce. (2018). Consumption and Income Inequality since the 1960s. Econstor (Econstor). 2018(1). 23–26.1 indexed citations
10.
Meyer, Bruce & Wallace K. C. Mok. (2013). Disability, Earnings, Income and Consumption. RePEc: Research Papers in Economics.10 indexed citations
11.
Meyer, Bruce & James X. Sullivan. (2013). Winning the War: Poverty from the Great Society to the Great Recession. Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University).1 indexed citations
12.
Meyer, Bruce, et al.. (2013). The Validity of Consumption Data: Are the Consumer Expenditure Interview and Diary Surveys Informative?. National Bureau of Economic Research. 204–240.20 indexed citations
13.
Meyer, Bruce & Laura Wherry. (2012). Saving Teens: Using a Policy Discontinuity to Estimate the Effects of Medicaid Eligibility. SSRN Electronic Journal.1 indexed citations
14.
Meyer, Bruce & James X. Sullivan. (2011). The Material Well-Being of the Poor and the Middle Class since 1980. 40.9 indexed citations
15.
Meyer, Bruce. (2007). Lessons from the U.S. Unemployment Insurance Experiments. Journal of Economic Literature. 33(1). 91–131.131 indexed citations
16.
Meyer, Bruce & Bradley T. Heim. (2004). Structural Labor Supply Models when Budget Constraints are Nonlinear. RePEc: Research Papers in Economics.4 indexed citations
17.
Meyer, Bruce, Alan J. Auerbach, Bertil Holmlund, Alan B. Krueger, & Costas Meghir. (2002). Unemployment and Workers’ Compensation Programs: Rationale, Design, Labor Supply, and Income Support.3 indexed citations
18.
Anderson, Patricia M. & Bruce Meyer. (2001). The Effects of the Unemployment Insurance Payroll Tax on Wages, Employment, Claims and Denials. SSRN Electronic Journal.3 indexed citations
19.
Meyer, Bruce. (2001). Taxes, Welfare, and Work by Single Mothers. Econstor (Econstor). 13–17.5 indexed citations
20.
Meyer, Bruce. (1995). The Economic Effects of Unemployment Insurance. 14.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.