Brooke M. McCartney

1.8k total citations
36 papers, 1.5k citations indexed

About

Brooke M. McCartney is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Cell Biology and Neurology. According to data from OpenAlex, Brooke M. McCartney has authored 36 papers receiving a total of 1.5k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 25 papers in Molecular Biology, 19 papers in Cell Biology and 5 papers in Neurology. Recurrent topics in Brooke M. McCartney's work include Wnt/β-catenin signaling in development and cancer (15 papers), Hippo pathway signaling and YAP/TAZ (10 papers) and Cancer-related gene regulation (10 papers). Brooke M. McCartney is often cited by papers focused on Wnt/β-catenin signaling in development and cancer (15 papers), Hippo pathway signaling and YAP/TAZ (10 papers) and Cancer-related gene regulation (10 papers). Brooke M. McCartney collaborates with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Switzerland. Brooke M. McCartney's co-authors include Richard G. Fehon, Mark Peifer, Dennis LaJeunesse, Inke Näthke, Amy Bejsovec, Elizabeth E. Grevengoed, Rima M. Kulikauskas, Kathryn Akong, David M. Roberts and Donald G. McEwen and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Biological Chemistry, Nature Communications and The Journal of Cell Biology.

In The Last Decade

Brooke M. McCartney

32 papers receiving 1.5k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Brooke M. McCartney United States 20 1.1k 783 199 145 92 36 1.5k
Lee A. Ligon United States 18 1.1k 1.0× 946 1.2× 348 1.7× 215 1.5× 39 0.4× 24 1.8k
Lilli Winter Austria 18 675 0.6× 705 0.9× 168 0.8× 26 0.2× 89 1.0× 35 1.2k
Marie-Josée Santoni France 23 1.3k 1.2× 663 0.8× 270 1.4× 55 0.4× 50 0.5× 30 1.8k
Irmgard Fischer Austria 21 688 0.6× 744 1.0× 149 0.7× 21 0.1× 84 0.9× 34 1.2k
Raphaël Bergès France 14 391 0.4× 239 0.3× 131 0.7× 105 0.7× 42 0.5× 21 754
Patricia Kunda Argentina 14 842 0.8× 1.2k 1.5× 311 1.6× 81 0.6× 19 0.2× 20 1.7k
Eva Faurobert France 20 696 0.6× 337 0.4× 190 1.0× 283 2.0× 15 0.2× 37 1.3k
Alessia Errico Italy 15 788 0.7× 446 0.6× 349 1.8× 84 0.6× 30 0.3× 51 1.4k
Erkki Raulo Finland 15 847 0.8× 782 1.0× 265 1.3× 28 0.2× 33 0.4× 17 1.4k
Tarja Kinnunen Finland 17 700 0.6× 706 0.9× 226 1.1× 20 0.1× 31 0.3× 22 1.2k

Countries citing papers authored by Brooke M. McCartney

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Brooke M. McCartney's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Brooke M. McCartney with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Brooke M. McCartney more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Brooke M. McCartney

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Brooke M. McCartney. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Brooke M. McCartney. The network helps show where Brooke M. McCartney may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Brooke M. McCartney

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Brooke M. McCartney. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Brooke M. McCartney based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Brooke M. McCartney. Brooke M. McCartney is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
McCartney, Brooke M. & Omaya Dudin. (2023). Cellularization across eukaryotes: Conserved mechanisms and novel strategies. Current Opinion in Cell Biology. 80. 102157–102157. 13 indexed citations
2.
McCartney, Brooke M., et al.. (2022). A Diaphanous and Enabled-dependent asymmetric actin cable array repositions nuclei during Drosophila oogenesis. Development. 149(13). 2 indexed citations
3.
Shiwarski, Daniel J., Joshua W. Tashman, Alkiviadis Tsamis, et al.. (2020). Fibronectin-based nanomechanical biosensors to map 3D surface strains in live cells and tissue. Nature Communications. 11(1). 21 indexed citations
4.
Kirkpatrick, Catherine, Annette F. Baas, Herman A. Dierick, et al.. (2020). Drosophila Apc2 Is a Cytoskeletally-Associated Protein That Regulates Wingless Signaling in the Embryonic Epidermis. UNC Libraries.
5.
McCartney, Brooke M., et al.. (2016). Proteomic analysis reveals APC-dependent post translational modifications and identifies a novel regulator of β-catenin. Development. 143(14). 2629–40. 12 indexed citations
6.
7.
Averick, Saadyah, Olivia Molinar‐Inglis, Brooke M. McCartney, et al.. (2015). Bright Fluorescent Nanotags from Bottlebrush Polymers with DNA-Tipped Bristles. ACS Central Science. 1(8). 431–438. 59 indexed citations
8.
Roberts, David M., et al.. (2014). Self-association of the APC tumor suppressor is required for the assembly, stability, and activity of the Wnt signaling destruction complex. Molecular Biology of the Cell. 25(21). 3424–3436. 37 indexed citations
9.
McCartney, Brooke M., et al.. (2011). Cortical localization of APC2 plays a role in actin organization but not in Wnt signaling inDrosophila. Journal of Cell Science. 124(9). 1589–1600. 21 indexed citations
11.
Thorpe, Lauren M., et al.. (2010). Apical constriction and invagination downstream of the canonical Wnt signaling pathway require Rho1 and Myosin II. Developmental Biology. 340(1). 54–66. 17 indexed citations
12.
Näthke, Inke & Brooke M. McCartney. (2009). APC Proteins. Advances in experimental medicine and biology. 2 indexed citations
13.
Watkins, Simon C., et al.. (2009). Using total internal reflection fluorescence (TIRF) microscopy to visualize cortical actin and microtubules in the Drosophila syncytial embryo. Developmental Dynamics. 238(10). 2622–2632. 11 indexed citations
14.
McCartney, Brooke M. & Inke Näthke. (2008). Cell regulation by the Apc protein. Current Opinion in Cell Biology. 20(2). 186–193. 110 indexed citations
15.
Roberts, David M., et al.. (2006). Cytoskeletal dynamics and cell signaling during planar polarity establishment in the Drosophila embryonic denticle. Journal of Cell Science. 119(3). 403–415. 62 indexed citations
16.
McCartney, Brooke M. & Mark Peifer. (2003). Stem Cells in the News. Developmental Cell. 5(4). 532–534. 2 indexed citations
17.
Akong, Kathryn, Elizabeth E. Grevengoed, Brooke M. McCartney, et al.. (2002). Drosophila APC2 and APC1 Play Overlapping Roles in Wingless Signaling in the Embryo and Imaginal Discs. Developmental Biology. 250(1). 91–100. 56 indexed citations
18.
Akong, Kathryn, Brooke M. McCartney, & Mark Peifer. (2002). Drosophila APC2 and APC1 Have Overlapping Roles in the Larval Brain Despite Their Distinct Intracellular Localizations. Developmental Biology. 250(1). 71–90. 56 indexed citations
19.
LaJeunesse, Dennis, Brooke M. McCartney, & Richard G. Fehon. (2001). A Systematic Screen for Dominant Second-Site Modifiers of Merlin/NF2 Phenotypes Reveals an Interaction With blistered/DSRF and scribbler. Genetics. 158(2). 667–679. 22 indexed citations
20.
McCartney, Brooke M., Rima M. Kulikauskas, Dennis LaJeunesse, & Richard G. Fehon. (2000). The Neurofibromatosis-2 homologue, Merlin, and the tumor suppressor expanded function together in Drosophila to regulate cell proliferation and differentiation. Development. 127(6). 1315–1324. 122 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026