Brooke Bishop

645 citations
4 papers · 539 · h-index 4

Impact in

    • Cervical Cancer and HPV Research
    • Hepatitis B Virus Studies
    • DNA Repair Mechanisms
    • DNA and Nucleic Acid Chemistry
    • Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics

Papers in

    • DNA Repair Mechanisms 1
    • Glycosylation and Glycoproteins Research 1
    • vaccines and immunoinformatics approaches 1
    • Cervical Cancer and HPV Research 2

Brooke Bishop

4 papers receiving 530 citations

Peers

Brooke Bishop
Comparison fields: 5 of 61
  • Epidemiology 186
  • Molecular Biology 338
  • Genetics 135
  • Virology 22
  • Microbiology 28
Replace Beat Amstutz with:
Beat Amstutz Switzerland
Manfred Wirth Germany
Pauline B. McIntosh United Kingdom
Gill Elliott United Kingdom
James H. Gilbert United States
Louis E.-C. Leong Singapore
Sabrina Bodevin Sweden
Nozomi Sakakibara United States
Cyril M. Sanders United Kingdom
Catherine Bonne-Andréa France
Brooke Bishop relative to Beat Amstutz Switzerland Beat Amstutz's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.8×
Beat Amstutz · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Brooke Bishop

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Brooke Bishop's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Brooke Bishop with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Brooke Bishop more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Brooke Bishop

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Brooke Bishop. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Brooke Bishop. The network helps show where Brooke Bishop may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 14 scholars most cited alongside Brooke Bishop, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Brooke Bishop Line = papers co-authored together Brooke Bishop links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

About Brooke Bishop

Brooke Bishop is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Epidemiology, Genetics, Ecology and Animal Science and Zoology, having authored 4 papers that have together received 539 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cervical Cancer and HPV Research (2 papers), DNA Repair Mechanisms (1 paper), Proteoglycans and glycosaminoglycans research (1 paper), Glycosylation and Glycoproteins Research (1 paper), Enzyme Structure and Function (1 paper), Immunotherapy and Immune Responses (1 paper), vaccines and immunoinformatics approaches (1 paper) and Bacterial Genetics and Biotechnology (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Epidemiology (186 citations), Molecular Biology (338 citations), Genetics (135 citations), Virology (22 citations) and Microbiology (28 citations). Brooke Bishop has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Sweden. Frequent co-authors include Xiaojiang S. Chen, J. Dasgupta, Robert A. Sclafani, Ronald P. Leon, Ryan J. Fletcher, Craig M. Ogata, Michael G. Klein, Robert L. Garcea, Rui Zhao and Neil D. Christensen. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Biological Chemistry, Virology Journal and Nature Structural & Molecular Biology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact