Brita Sedlmayr
- Health Information Management top 2%
- General Health Professions
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
- Molecular Biology
- Surgery
- Co-authors
- Hans‐Ulrich ProkoschMartin SedlmayrJannik SchaafManfred Criegee‐RieckHolger StorfLena GriebelAntje NeubertWolfgang Rascher
- Topics
- Electronic Health Records Systems (11 papers)Genomics and Rare Diseases (7 papers)Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies (6 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaBioMed Research InternationalBritish Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
- Partner nations
- GermanyUnited KingdomFrance
In The Last Decade
Brita Sedlmayr
28 papers receiving 259 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 86
- Health Information Management 85
- General Health Professions 61
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 56
- Molecular Biology 35
- Surgery 31
Countries citing papers authored by Brita Sedlmayr
This map shows the geographic impact of Brita Sedlmayr's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Brita Sedlmayr with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Brita Sedlmayr more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Brita Sedlmayr
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Brita Sedlmayr. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Brita Sedlmayr. The network helps show where Brita Sedlmayr may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Brita Sedlmayr
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Brita Sedlmayr. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Brita Sedlmayr based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Brita Sedlmayr. Brita Sedlmayr is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 2 | |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | 5 | |
| 5 | 2 | |
| 6 | 6 | |
| 7 | 1 | |
| 8 | 1 | |
| 9 | 16 | |
| 10 | 0 | |
| 11 | 2 | |
| 12 | 24 | |
| 13 | 7 | |
| 14 | 19 | |
| 15 | 16 | |
| 16 | 24 | |
| 17 | 11 | |
| 18 | 5 | |
| 19 | 7 | |
| 20 | 22 |
About Brita Sedlmayr
Brita Sedlmayr is a scholar working on Health Information Management, Health Informatics and Family Practice, having authored 34 papers that have together received 268 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Electronic Health Records Systems (11 papers), Genomics and Rare Diseases (7 papers) and Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health Information Management (85 citations), Health Informatics (21 citations) and Family Practice (14 citations). Brita Sedlmayr has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United Kingdom and France. Frequent co-authors include Hans‐Ulrich Prokosch, Martin Sedlmayr, Jannik Schaaf, Manfred Criegee‐Rieck, Holger Storf, Lena Griebel, Antje Neubert, Wolfgang Rascher, Harald Dormann and Thomas Bürkle. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, BioMed Research International and British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.