Brian M. Wing

515 citations
11 papers · 402 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

Brian M. Wing

11 papers receiving 398 citations

Peers

Brian M. Wing
Comparison fields: 5 of 42
  • Environmental Engineering 285
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 203
  • Global and Planetary Change 216
  • Insect Science 95
  • Ecology 196
Replace Patrick A. Fekety with:
Patrick A. Fekety United States
Sebastian Schnell Sweden
Radomir Bałazy Poland
Olga Brovkina Czechia
Martin Queinnec Canada
Ekena Rangel Pinagé United States
Lin Cao China
Keiko Ioki Japan
Sean M.A. Jeronimo United States
Karin Y. van Ewijk Canada
Brian M. Wing relative to Patrick A. Fekety United States Patrick A. Fekety's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×14.5×
Patrick A. Fekety · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Brian M. Wing

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Brian M. Wing's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Brian M. Wing with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Brian M. Wing more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Brian M. Wing

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Brian M. Wing. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Brian M. Wing. The network helps show where Brian M. Wing may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Brian M. Wing, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Brian M. Wing Line = papers co-authored together Brian M. Wing links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

11 of 11 papers shown
#Work
1 2012127
2 201790
3 201558
4 201846
5 201820
6 201819
7 200815
8 201910
9 20217
10 20227
11
Refining FIA plot locations using LiDAR point clouds
20153

About Brian M. Wing

Brian M. Wing is a scholar working on Nature and Landscape Conservation, Environmental Engineering, Global and Planetary Change, Insect Science and Ecology, having authored 11 papers that have together received 402 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications (7 papers), Forest ecology and management (7 papers), Fire effects on ecosystems (4 papers), Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies (4 papers), Forest Management and Policy (2 papers), Rangeland and Wildlife Management (2 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (2 papers) and Remote Sensing in Agriculture (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Environmental Engineering (285 citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (203 citations), Global and Planetary Change (216 citations), Insect Science (95 citations) and Ecology (196 citations). Brian M. Wing has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Finland. Frequent co-authors include Martin W. Ritchie, Kevin Boston, Michael J. Olsen, Warren B. Cohen, Alix I. Gitelman, Andrew T. Hudak, Bryce Kellogg, Jason Kreitler, Alistair M. S. Smith and Nicole M. Vaillant. Their work appears in journals such as Remote Sensing of Environment, Forest Ecology and Management, Forest Science, Remote Sensing and Canadian Journal of Forest Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact