Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Development of organic porosity in the Woodford Shale with increasing thermal maturity
2012921 citationsMark E. Curtis, Brian J. Cardott et al.International Journal of Coal Geologyprofile →
Classification of liptinite – ICCP System 1994
2016685 citationsWalter Pickel, J. Kus et al.International Journal of Coal Geologyprofile →
Application of organic petrography in North American shale petroleum systems: A review
2016399 citationsPaul C. Hackley, Brian J. CardottInternational Journal of Coal Geologyprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by Brian J. Cardott
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Brian J. Cardott's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Brian J. Cardott with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Brian J. Cardott more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Brian J. Cardott
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Brian J. Cardott. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Brian J. Cardott. The network helps show where Brian J. Cardott may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Brian J. Cardott
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Brian J. Cardott.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Brian J. Cardott based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Brian J. Cardott. Brian J. Cardott is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Pickel, Walter, J. Kus, Deolinda Flores, et al.. (2016). Classification of liptinite – ICCP System 1994. International Journal of Coal Geology. 169. 40–61.685 indexed citations breakdown →
4.
Hackley, Paul C. & Brian J. Cardott. (2016). Application of organic petrography in North American shale petroleum systems: A review. International Journal of Coal Geology. 163. 8–51.399 indexed citations breakdown →
5.
Gilbert, M. Charles, R. Paul Philp, & Brian J. Cardott. (2016). Petroleum Migration Through Basement in Southwest Oklahoma, U.S.A.. 67(6). 232–249.1 indexed citations
Curtis, Mark E., Brian J. Cardott, Carl Sondergeld, & Chandra Rai. (2012). Development of organic porosity in the Woodford Shale with increasing thermal maturity. International Journal of Coal Geology. 103. 26–31.921 indexed citations breakdown →
11.
Hackley, Paul C., Carla Viviane Araujo, Ángeles G. Borrego, et al.. (2011). ABSTRACT: New ASTM Standard Test MEthod D7708-11 for Determination of the Reflectance of Vitrinite Dispersed in Sedimentary Rocks.14 indexed citations
Cardott, Brian J., W. Metcalf, & J. L. Ahern. (1990). Thermal Maturation by Vitrinite Reflectance of Woodford Shale Near Washita Valley Fault, Arbuckle Mountains, Oklahoma. 139–146.3 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.