Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
A Regular Layout for Parallel Adders
1982796 citationsBrent, KungIEEE Transactions on Computersprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of Brent's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Brent with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Brent more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Brent. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Brent. The network helps show where Brent may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Brent
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Brent.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Brent based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Brent. Brent is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
11 of 11 papers shown
1.
Brent, et al.. (2016). Determination of volumetric changes at an underground stone mine： a photogrammetry case study. 矿业科学技术学报：英文版. 149–154.1 indexed citations
2.
Brent, et al.. (2016). Complementary and Alternative Medicine Therapies for Chronic Pain. 403–411.28 indexed citations
3.
Brent & Smith. (2016). Beyond the Concepts of the Secular and the Religious. Acta Scientiarum Naturalium Universitatis Sunyatseni. 37–52.1 indexed citations
4.
Brent, et al.. (2014). Urgent global opportunities to prevent birth defects.. 42.1 indexed citations
5.
Étienne, et al.. (2013). RESTful API in Life Science Research Systems and Data Integration Challenges： Linking Metabolic Pathway, Metabolic Network, Gene and Publication. 通讯和计算机：中英文版. 10(9). 1196–1199.
6.
Brent, et al.. (2013). Bisphenol A and obesity in children and adolescents. 36.7 indexed citations
7.
Brent, et al.. (2010). What are the reproductive and developmental risks of ionizing radiation. 8(2). 25–85.1 indexed citations
8.
Heath, et al.. (2009). The effects of selection for cold tolerance on cross-tolerance to other environmental stressors in Drosophila melanogaster. 中国昆虫科学：英文版. 263–276.3 indexed citations
Brent. (1994). A Comparison of Three Distributed File SYstem Architectures : Vnode, SPrite, and Plan 9.1 indexed citations
11.
Brent & Kung. (1982). A Regular Layout for Parallel Adders. IEEE Transactions on Computers. C-31(3). 260–264.796 indexed citations breakdown →
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.