Bree Bang-Jensen
About
In The Last Decade
Bree Bang-Jensen
3 papers receiving 305 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 72
- Modeling and Simulation 129
- Economics and Econometrics 104
- Sociology and Political Science 90
- General Health Professions 69
- Health 56
Countries citing papers authored by Bree Bang-Jensen
This map shows the geographic impact of Bree Bang-Jensen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Bree Bang-Jensen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Bree Bang-Jensen more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Bree Bang-Jensen
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Bree Bang-Jensen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Bree Bang-Jensen. The network helps show where Bree Bang-Jensen may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Bree Bang-Jensen
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Bree Bang-Jensen. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Bree Bang-Jensen based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Bree Bang-Jensen. Bree Bang-Jensen is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 19 | |
| 3 | 15 | |
| 4 | 283 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.