� Brandt
- Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition top 5%
- Occupational Therapy top 2%
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 10%
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine
- Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation top 10%
- Topics
- Educational Games and Gamification (1 paper)Advanced Software Engineering Methodologies (1 paper)Advanced Vision and Imaging (1 paper)
- Cited by
- Occupational TherapyPhysical Therapy, Sports Therapy and RehabilitationComputer Vision and Pattern Recognition
- Partner nations
- United StatesSwedenIsrael
In The Last Decade
� Brandt
11 papers receiving 405 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 101
- Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 153
- Occupational Therapy 102
- Psychiatry and Mental health 92
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 46
- Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation 36
Countries citing papers authored by � Brandt
This map shows the geographic impact of � Brandt's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by � Brandt with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites � Brandt more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by � Brandt
This network shows the impact of papers produced by � Brandt. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by � Brandt. The network helps show where � Brandt may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of � Brandt
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of � Brandt. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of � Brandt based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with � Brandt. � Brandt is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Integrating system descriptions by clocked guarded actions | 8 |
| 2 | 191 | |
| 3 | 16 | |
| 4 | Gambling on a Simulated Slot Machine under Conditions of Repeated Play | 1 |
| 5 | A Dictionary of Letter Words | 1 |
| 6 | 144 | |
| 7 | Health informatics standards: a user's guide. | 4 |
| 8 | 0 | |
| 9 | 25 | |
| 10 | Measuring and improving performance: a practical approach to implementing a productivity program. | 1 |
| 11 | 13 | |
| 12 | Cement-aggregate reaction and the deterioration of concrete structures in the Cape Peninsula | 2 |
| 13 | The Ship of Fools | 1 |
| 14 | Applications of Computers to Medicine | 19 |
About � Brandt
� Brandt is a scholar working on Occupational Therapy, Health Information Management and Hardware and Architecture, having authored 14 papers that have together received 426 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Educational Games and Gamification (1 paper), Advanced Software Engineering Methodologies (1 paper) and Advanced Vision and Imaging (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Occupational Therapy (102 citations), Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation (36 citations) and Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (153 citations) � Brandt has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Sweden and Israel. Frequent co-authors include Antti Malmivaara, Kersti Samuelsson, Basri Basri and Smith. Their work appears in journals such as The American Naturalist, Dermatologic Surgery and Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.