This map shows the geographic impact of Bram Lievens's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Bram Lievens with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Bram Lievens more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Bram Lievens. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Bram Lievens. The network helps show where Bram Lievens may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Bram Lievens
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Bram Lievens.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Bram Lievens based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Bram Lievens. Bram Lievens is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Lievens, Bram, et al.. (2014). Drivers for End-users' Collaboration In Participatory Innovation Development and Living Lab Processes. Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University).6 indexed citations
4.
Schuurman, Dimitri, et al.. (2014). Living labs for in-situ open innovation: from idea to product validation and beyond. Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University).2 indexed citations
Veeckman, Carina, et al.. (2012). The impact of the organizational set-up of Living Labs on the innovation process: a case study between different living lab approaches in Flanders. Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University).2 indexed citations
7.
Schuurman, Dimitri, Bram Lievens, Lieven De Marez, & Pieter Ballon. (2012). Towards optimal user involvement in innovation processes: A panel-centered Living Lab-approach. Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University). 2046–2054.26 indexed citations
Lievens, Bram, et al.. (2011). Cross Border Living Labs Networks to Support SMEs Accessing New Markets. VUBIR (Vrije Universiteit Brussel).7 indexed citations
Lebeau, Kenneth, Cathy Macharis, Laurence Turcksin, Joeri Van Mierlo, & Bram Lievens. (2010). Living Labs for electric vehicles in Europe.. VUBIR (Vrije Universiteit Brussel).2 indexed citations
13.
Pierson, Jos, et al.. (2009). How to make friends? Characteristics of offline communities affecting the impact of social network sites on intra-community cohesion.. VUBIR (Vrije Universiteit Brussel).1 indexed citations
Lievens, Bram, et al.. (2008). Proxy technology assessment as a multi-method approach for identifying social requirements of co-creative media. VUBIR (Vrije Universiteit Brussel). 12–18.3 indexed citations
16.
Broeck, Wendy Van den, Jos Pierson, & Bram Lievens. (2007). Video-on-demand: towards new viewing practices?. VUBIR (Vrije Universiteit Brussel).7 indexed citations
17.
Broeck, Wendy Van den, Jos Pierson, & Bram Lievens. (2007). VOD: towards new viewing practices?. VUBIR (Vrije Universiteit Brussel). 1(3). 23–44.1 indexed citations
18.
Broeck, Wendy Van den, Bram Lievens, & Jos Pierson. (2006). Domestication research for media and technology development: a case study. VUBIR (Vrije Universiteit Brussel).4 indexed citations
19.
Pierson, Jos, Bram Lievens, & Pieter Ballon. (2005). Living labs for broadband innovation: Configuring user involvement. VUBIR (Vrije Universiteit Brussel).2 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.