Braj Raj Singh
- Materials Chemistry top 5%
- Biomedical Engineering top 5%
- Molecular Biology
- Plant Science top 5%
- Pollution top 5%
- Co-authors
- Alim H. NaqviBrahma N. SinghWasi KhanJaved MusarratHarikesh Bahadur SinghSaima UsmaniMohd ShoebAkanksha Singh
- Topics
- Nanoparticles: synthesis and applications (18 papers)Graphene and Nanomaterials Applications (8 papers)Bacterial biofilms and quorum sensing (8 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaPLoS ONEBiomaterials
- Partner nations
- IndiaSaudi ArabiaAustralia
In The Last Decade
Braj Raj Singh
50 papers receiving 2.7k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 128
- Materials Chemistry 1.2k
- Biomedical Engineering 641
- Molecular Biology 636
- Plant Science 540
- Pollution 220
Countries citing papers authored by Braj Raj Singh
This map shows the geographic impact of Braj Raj Singh's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Braj Raj Singh with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Braj Raj Singh more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Braj Raj Singh
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Braj Raj Singh. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Braj Raj Singh. The network helps show where Braj Raj Singh may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Braj Raj Singh
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Braj Raj Singh. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Braj Raj Singh based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Braj Raj Singh. Braj Raj Singh is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 12 | |
| 3 | 86 | |
| 4 | 27 | |
| 5 | 19 | |
| 6 | 55 | |
| 7 | 6 | |
| 8 | 25 | |
| 9 | 148 | |
| 10 | 26 | |
| 11 | 43 | |
| 12 | 50 | |
| 13 | 179 | |
| 14 | 102 | |
| 15 | 97 | |
| 16 | 83 | |
| 17 | 137 | |
| 18 | 7 | |
| 19 | 12 | |
| 20 | Cortisol and glycemic response to open and laparoscopic cholecystectomy - A comparative evaluation | 1 |
About Braj Raj Singh
Braj Raj Singh is a scholar working on Molecular Medicine, Materials Chemistry and Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, having authored 51 papers that have together received 2.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Nanoparticles: synthesis and applications (18 papers), Graphene and Nanomaterials Applications (8 papers) and Bacterial biofilms and quorum sensing (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Molecular Medicine (147 citations), Materials Chemistry (1.2k citations) and Complementary and alternative medicine (184 citations). Braj Raj Singh has collaborated with scholars based in India, Saudi Arabia and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Alim H. Naqvi, Brahma N. Singh, Wasi Khan, Javed Musarrat, Harikesh Bahadur Singh, Saima Usmani, Mohd Shoeb, Akanksha Singh, A. H. Naqvi and Abdulaziz A. Al‐Khedhairy. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, PLoS ONE and Biomaterials.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.