Bradley W. Vines
- Neurology top 1%
- Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies 6
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 2%
- Neuroscience and Music Perception 9
- Motor Control and Adaptation 2
- Music top 0.5%
- Diverse Music Education Insights 2
- Rehabilitation top 5%
-
- Multisensory perception and integration 3
-
- Music and Audio Processing 4
-
- Music Technology and Sound Studies 4
-
- Muscle activation and electromyography studies 2
- Co-authors
- Gottfried SchlaugMarcelo M. WanderleyDaniel J. LevitinCarol L. KrumhanslDinesh NairAndrea NortonNeil MiddletonCory McKay
- Cited by
- NeurologyCognitive NeuroscienceMusic
- Journals
- Neuroreport (3 papers)Music Perception An Interdisciplinary Journal (2 papers)Cognition (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesCanadaAustralia
In The Last Decade
Bradley W. Vines
17 papers receiving 1.4k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 112
- Neurology 599
- Cognitive Neuroscience 1.0k
- Music 160
- Rehabilitation 149
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 242
Countries citing papers authored by Bradley W. Vines
This map shows the geographic impact of Bradley W. Vines's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Bradley W. Vines with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Bradley W. Vines more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Bradley W. Vines
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Bradley W. Vines. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Bradley W. Vines. The network helps show where Bradley W. Vines may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 24 scholars most cited alongside Bradley W. Vines, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2021 | 4 | |
| 2 | 2013 | 100 | |
| 3 | 2011 | 105 | |
| 4 | 2010 | 85 | |
| 5 | 2009 | 20 | |
| 6 | 2008 | 260 | |
| 7 | 2008 | 96 | |
| 8 | 2007 | 67 | |
| 9 | 2006 | 97 | |
| 10 | 2006 | 139 | |
| 11 | 2005 | 223 | |
| 12 | 2005 | 27 | |
| 13 | 2005 | 28 | |
| 14 | 2005 | 152 | |
| 15 | 2004 | 53 | |
| 16 | Performance Gestures of Musicians: What structural and emotional information do they convey | 2003 | 4 |
| 17 | 1997 | 11 |
About Bradley W. Vines
Bradley W. Vines is a scholar working on Neurology, Music and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 17 papers that have together received 1.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neuroscience and Music Perception (9 papers), Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies (6 papers), Music and Audio Processing (4 papers), Music Technology and Sound Studies (4 papers), Multisensory perception and integration (3 papers), Diverse Music Education Insights (2 papers), Motor Control and Adaptation (2 papers) and Muscle activation and electromyography studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Neurology (599 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (1.0k citations) and Music (160 citations). Bradley W. Vines has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Gottfried Schlaug, Marcelo M. Wanderley, Daniel J. Levitin, Carol L. Krumhansl, Dinesh Nair, Andrea Norton, Neil Middleton, Cory McKay, Regina Nuzzo and J. O. Ramsay. Their work appears in journals such as Neuroreport, Music Perception An Interdisciplinary Journal, Cognition, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences and Canadian Psychology/Psychologie canadienne.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.