Boris Rauchverger
About
In The Last Decade
Boris Rauchverger
4 papers receiving 359 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 46
- Psychiatry and Mental health 232
- Clinical Psychology 192
- Cognitive Neuroscience 104
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 80
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 50
Countries citing papers authored by Boris Rauchverger
This map shows the geographic impact of Boris Rauchverger's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Boris Rauchverger with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Boris Rauchverger more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Boris Rauchverger
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Boris Rauchverger. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Boris Rauchverger. The network helps show where Boris Rauchverger may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Boris Rauchverger
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Boris Rauchverger. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Boris Rauchverger based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Boris Rauchverger. Boris Rauchverger is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 95 | |
| 3 | 119 | |
| 4 | 13 | |
| 5 | 151 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.