Bodo Billerbeck
- Information Systems top 5%
- Artificial Intelligence top 10%
- Signal Processing top 10%
- Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition top 10%
- Computer Networks and Communications
- Co-authors
- Justin ZobelFalk ScholerHugh WilliamsRyen W. WhiteKevyn Collins‐ThompsonPaul N. BennettDavid SontagSusan Dumais
- Topics
- Information Retrieval and Search Behavior (11 papers)Web Data Mining and Analysis (7 papers)Data Management and Algorithms (5 papers)
- Partner nations
- AustraliaUnited StatesGermany
In The Last Decade
Bodo Billerbeck
19 papers receiving 278 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 33
- Information Systems 230
- Artificial Intelligence 161
- Signal Processing 85
- Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 67
- Computer Networks and Communications 33
Countries citing papers authored by Bodo Billerbeck
This map shows the geographic impact of Bodo Billerbeck's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Bodo Billerbeck with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Bodo Billerbeck more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Bodo Billerbeck
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Bodo Billerbeck. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Bodo Billerbeck. The network helps show where Bodo Billerbeck may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Bodo Billerbeck
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Bodo Billerbeck. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Bodo Billerbeck based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Bodo Billerbeck. Bodo Billerbeck is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |
| 2 | 2 | |
| 3 | 12 | |
| 4 | 3 | |
| 5 | 3 | |
| 6 | 4 | |
| 7 | 74 | |
| 8 | Microsoft Research at TREC 2011 Web Track | 5 |
| 9 | 3 | |
| 10 | 20 | |
| 11 | Examining the pseudo-standard web search engine results page | 4 |
| 12 | RMIT University at TREC 2005: Terabyte and Robust Track. | 11 |
| 13 | Document expansion versus query expansion for ad-hoc retrieval | 22 |
| 14 | 8 | |
| 15 | RMIT University at TREC 2004 | 7 |
| 16 | Questioning query expansion: an examination of behaviour and parameters | 42 |
| 17 | 14 | |
| 18 | 9 | |
| 19 | 72 |
About Bodo Billerbeck
Bodo Billerbeck is a scholar working on Information Systems, Signal Processing and Artificial Intelligence, having authored 19 papers that have together received 317 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Information Retrieval and Search Behavior (11 papers), Web Data Mining and Analysis (7 papers) and Data Management and Algorithms (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Information Systems (230 citations), Signal Processing (85 citations) and Artificial Intelligence (161 citations). Bodo Billerbeck has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Justin Zobel, Falk Scholer, Hugh Williams, Ryen W. White, Kevyn Collins‐Thompson, Paul N. Bennett, David Sontag, Susan Dumais, Nick Craswell and Andrew Turpin. Their work appears in journals such as ACM Transactions on Information Systems, Information Systems and Information Retrieval.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.