Bocheng Jing
- Nephrology top 2%
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine top 10%
- Surgery
- Geriatrics and Gerontology top 5%
- Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism top 10%
- Co-authors
- Uptal D. PatelSaraladevi NaickerJohn W. StaniferMichael A. SteinmanKathy FungW. John BoscardinSei J. LeeTimothy S. Anderson
- Topics
- Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes (15 papers)Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies (13 papers)Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (9 papers)
- Journals
- JAMACirculationBMJ
- Partner nations
- United StatesBrazilCanada
In The Last Decade
Bocheng Jing
36 papers receiving 749 citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 92
- Nephrology 281
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 196
- Surgery 130
- Geriatrics and Gerontology 117
- Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism 98
Countries citing papers authored by Bocheng Jing
This map shows the geographic impact of Bocheng Jing's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Bocheng Jing with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Bocheng Jing more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Bocheng Jing
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Bocheng Jing. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Bocheng Jing. The network helps show where Bocheng Jing may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Bocheng Jing
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Bocheng Jing. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Bocheng Jing based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Bocheng Jing. Bocheng Jing is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 3 | |
| 3 | 2 | |
| 4 | 4 | |
| 5 | 9 | |
| 6 | 22 | |
| 7 | 7 | |
| 8 | 5 | |
| 9 | 1 | |
| 10 | 1 | |
| 11 | 1 | |
| 12 | 8 | |
| 13 | 5 | |
| 14 | 12 | |
| 15 | 8 | |
| 16 | 41 | |
| 17 | 20 | |
| 18 | 15 | |
| 19 | 82 | |
| 20 | The epidemiology of chronic kidney disease in sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review and meta-analysisbreakdown → | 377 |
About Bocheng Jing
Bocheng Jing is a scholar working on Geriatrics and Gerontology, Family Practice and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, having authored 40 papers that have together received 764 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes (15 papers), Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies (13 papers) and Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (9 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nephrology (281 citations), Geriatrics and Gerontology (117 citations) and Family Practice (28 citations). Bocheng Jing has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Brazil and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Uptal D. Patel, Saraladevi Naicker, John W. Stanifer, Michael A. Steinman, Kathy Fung, W. John Boscardin, Sei J. Lee, Timothy S. Anderson, Raoul J. Burchette and Stephen F. Derose. Their work appears in journals such as JAMA, Circulation and BMJ.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.