Blakesley Burkhart
- Astronomy and Astrophysics top 2%
- Nuclear and High Energy Physics top 10%
- Instrumentation top 5%
- Atmospheric Science top 10%
- Spectroscopy top 10%
- Co-authors
- Mark R. KrumholzA. LazarianJohn C. ForbesRoland M. CrockerLars HernquistPhilip MoczSnežana StanimirovićGreg L. Bryan
- Topics
- Astrophysics and Star Formation Studies (64 papers)Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies (44 papers)Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena (38 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesGermanyAustralia
In The Last Decade
Blakesley Burkhart
74 papers receiving 1.4k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 45
- Astronomy and Astrophysics 1.5k
- Nuclear and High Energy Physics 204
- Instrumentation 202
- Atmospheric Science 122
- Spectroscopy 84
Countries citing papers authored by Blakesley Burkhart
This map shows the geographic impact of Blakesley Burkhart's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Blakesley Burkhart with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Blakesley Burkhart more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Blakesley Burkhart
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Blakesley Burkhart. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Blakesley Burkhart. The network helps show where Blakesley Burkhart may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Blakesley Burkhart
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Blakesley Burkhart. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Blakesley Burkhart based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Blakesley Burkhart. Blakesley Burkhart is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |
| 2 | 2 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 0 | |
| 5 | 4 | |
| 6 | 3 | |
| 7 | 26 | |
| 8 | 24 | |
| 9 | 3 | |
| 10 | 7 | |
| 11 | 12 | |
| 12 | 24 | |
| 13 | 6 | |
| 14 | 17 | |
| 15 | 74 | |
| 16 | 14 | |
| 17 | 1 | |
| 18 | 30 | |
| 19 | 40 | |
| 20 | 109 |
About Blakesley Burkhart
Blakesley Burkhart is a scholar working on Astronomy and Astrophysics, Instrumentation and Nuclear and High Energy Physics, having authored 79 papers that have together received 1.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Astrophysics and Star Formation Studies (64 papers), Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies (44 papers) and Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena (38 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Astronomy and Astrophysics (1.5k citations), Instrumentation (202 citations) and Nuclear and High Energy Physics (204 citations). Blakesley Burkhart has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Mark R. Krumholz, A. Lazarian, John C. Forbes, Roland M. Crocker, Lars Hernquist, Philip Mocz, Snežana Stanimirović, Greg L. Bryan, G. Kowal and Christopher C. Hayward. Their work appears in journals such as Nature, The Astrophysical Journal and Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.