Björn Strander

3.8k total citations · 1 hit paper
51 papers, 2.7k citations indexed

About

Björn Strander is a scholar working on Epidemiology, Oncology and Obstetrics and Gynecology. According to data from OpenAlex, Björn Strander has authored 51 papers receiving a total of 2.7k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 49 papers in Epidemiology, 24 papers in Oncology and 13 papers in Obstetrics and Gynecology. Recurrent topics in Björn Strander's work include Cervical Cancer and HPV Research (49 papers), Global Cancer Incidence and Screening (23 papers) and Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments (13 papers). Björn Strander is often cited by papers focused on Cervical Cancer and HPV Research (49 papers), Global Cancer Incidence and Screening (23 papers) and Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments (13 papers). Björn Strander collaborates with scholars based in Sweden, United Kingdom and United States. Björn Strander's co-authors include Joakim Dillner, Walter Ryd, Pär Sparén, Sven Törnberg, Thomas Rådberg, Ian Milsom, Kristina Elfgren, Anders Strand, Eva Rylander and Göran Wadell and has published in prestigious journals such as New England Journal of Medicine, SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología and PLoS ONE.

In The Last Decade

Björn Strander

49 papers receiving 2.6k citations

Hit Papers

Human Papillomavirus and Papanicolaou Tests to Screen for... 2007 2026 2013 2019 2007 200 400 600

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Björn Strander Sweden 20 2.4k 1.0k 869 550 371 51 2.7k
Nancy Poitras United States 30 2.6k 1.1× 967 1.0× 1.2k 1.4× 503 0.9× 360 1.0× 62 2.9k
Barbara Fetterman United States 32 3.1k 1.3× 1.0k 1.0× 1.5k 1.8× 542 1.0× 366 1.0× 68 3.3k
Alan G. Waxman United States 17 2.5k 1.0× 1.1k 1.1× 882 1.0× 435 0.8× 259 0.7× 41 3.1k
L. Stewart Massad United States 16 1.5k 0.6× 601 0.6× 742 0.9× 418 0.8× 184 0.5× 52 2.0k
Pierre PL Martin-Hirsch United Kingdom 17 1.5k 0.6× 553 0.6× 545 0.6× 363 0.7× 177 0.5× 20 1.9k
George Koliopoulos Greece 21 3.7k 1.5× 1.1k 1.1× 1.5k 1.7× 897 1.6× 486 1.3× 57 4.1k
Elmar A. Joura Austria 31 2.2k 0.9× 462 0.5× 1.3k 1.5× 508 0.9× 248 0.7× 128 3.3k
Maribel Almonte France 22 1.8k 0.8× 716 0.7× 768 0.9× 206 0.4× 282 0.8× 63 2.2k
Hugo De Vuyst France 24 2.4k 1.0× 878 0.9× 1.2k 1.4× 202 0.4× 303 0.8× 49 2.7k
Alice Lytwyn Canada 24 1.4k 0.6× 593 0.6× 836 1.0× 282 0.5× 193 0.5× 60 2.1k

Countries citing papers authored by Björn Strander

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Björn Strander's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Björn Strander with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Björn Strander more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Björn Strander

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Björn Strander. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Björn Strander. The network helps show where Björn Strander may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Björn Strander

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Björn Strander. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Björn Strander based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Björn Strander. Björn Strander is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Yao, Q. Y., Jiangrong Wang, Miriam Elfström, et al.. (2024). Evaluation of primary HPV-based cervical screening among older women: Long-term follow-up of a randomized healthcare policy trial in Sweden. PLoS Medicine. 21(12). e1004505–e1004505.
3.
Wang, Jiangrong, et al.. (2023). Long‐term follow‐up of cervical cancer incidence after normal cytological findings. International Journal of Cancer. 154(3). 448–453. 6 indexed citations
4.
Zhang, Chenyang, et al.. (2023). Accuracy of colposcopy in the Swedish screening program. Acta Obstetricia Et Gynecologica Scandinavica. 102(5). 549–555. 8 indexed citations
6.
Zhang, Chenyang, et al.. (2022). Active expectancy as alternative to treatment for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 in women aged 25 to 30 years: ExCIN2—a prospective clinical multicenter cohort study. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 227(5). 742.e1–742.e11. 17 indexed citations
7.
8.
Wang, Jiangrong, Bengt Andrae, Björn Strander, Pär Sparén, & Joakim Dillner. (2020). Increase of cervical cancer incidence in Sweden in relation to screening history: population cohort study. Acta Oncologica. 59(8). 988–993. 14 indexed citations
9.
Wiik, Johanna, et al.. (2019). Abnormal cervical cytology is associated with preterm delivery: A population based study. Acta Obstetricia Et Gynecologica Scandinavica. 98(6). 777–786. 8 indexed citations
10.
Hortlund, Maria, et al.. (2018). Cervical cancer screening in Sweden 2014-2016. PLoS ONE. 13(12). e0209003–e0209003. 20 indexed citations
11.
Wang, Jiangrong, Anna‐Lena Östberg, Annsofie Adolfsson, et al.. (2018). Socio-economic and demographic determinants affecting participation in the Swedish cervical screening program: A population-based case-control study. PLoS ONE. 13(1). e0190171–e0190171. 68 indexed citations
12.
Nemes, Szilárd, et al.. (2016). Effect of Fee on Cervical Cancer Screening Attendance—ScreenFee, a Swedish Population-Based Randomised Trial. PLoS ONE. 11(3). e0150888–e0150888. 11 indexed citations
13.
Bornstein, Jacob, J. Bentley, P Bõsze, et al.. (2012). 2011 Colposcopic Terminology of the International Federation for Cervical Pathology and Colposcopy. Obstetrics and Gynecology. 120(1). 166–172. 304 indexed citations
14.
Andrae, Bengt, Therése Andersson, Paul C. Lambert, et al.. (2012). Screening and cervical cancer cure: population based cohort study. BMJ. 344(mar01 2). e900–e900. 150 indexed citations
15.
Bowring, Julie, Björn Strander, Martin Young, Ann Evans, & Patrick Walker. (2010). The Swede Score. Journal of Lower Genital Tract Disease. 14(4). 301–305. 56 indexed citations
16.
Strander, Björn, Agneta Andersson‐Ellström, Ian Milsom, Thomas Rådberg, & Walter Ryd. (2007). Liquid-based cytology versus conventional Papanicolaou smear in an organized screening program. Cancer. 111(5). 285–291. 74 indexed citations
17.
Nauclér, Pontus, Walter Ryd, Sven Törnberg, et al.. (2007). Human Papillomavirus and Papanicolaou Tests to Screen for Cervical Cancer. New England Journal of Medicine. 357(16). 1589–1597. 607 indexed citations breakdown →
18.
Gharizadeh, Baback, Biying Zheng, Michael S. Akhras, et al.. (2006). Sentinel-base DNA genotyping using multiple sequencing primers for high-risk human papillomaviruses. Molecular and Cellular Probes. 20(3-4). 230–238. 16 indexed citations
19.
Strander, Björn, et al.. (2005). The performance of a new scoring system for colposcopy in detecting high‐grade dysplasia in the uterine cervix. Acta Obstetricia Et Gynecologica Scandinavica. 84(10). 1013–1017. 61 indexed citations
20.
Elfgren, Kristina, Eva Rylander, Thomas Rådberg, et al.. (2005). Colposcopic and histopathologic evaluation of women participating in population-based screening for human papillomavirus deoxyribonucleic acid persistence. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 193(3). 650–657. 55 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026