Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Spectacle Lenses With Aspherical Lenslets for Myopia Control vs Single-Vision Spectacle Lenses
2022149 citationsJinhua Bao, Yingying Huang et al.profile →
One-year myopia control efficacy of spectacle lenses with aspherical lenslets
2021136 citationsJinhua Bao, Adeline Yang et al.British Journal of Ophthalmologyprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of Björn Drobe's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Björn Drobe with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Björn Drobe more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Björn Drobe. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Björn Drobe. The network helps show where Björn Drobe may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Björn Drobe
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Björn Drobe.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Björn Drobe based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Björn Drobe. Björn Drobe is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Bao, Jinhua, Yingying Huang, Xue Li, et al.. (2021). Myopia control with spectacle lenses with aspherical lenslets: a 2-year randomized clinical trial. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 62(8). 2888–2888.6 indexed citations
8.
Bao, Jinhua, Adeline Yang, Yingying Huang, et al.. (2021). One-year myopia control efficacy of spectacle lenses with aspherical lenslets. British Journal of Ophthalmology. 106(8). bjophthalmol–2020.136 indexed citations breakdown →
Drobe, Björn, Adeline Yang, Yingying Huang, et al.. (2020). Adaptation and visual comfort in children with new spectacle lenses containing concentric rings of contiguous aspherical micro-lenses for myopia control. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 61(7). 94–94.1 indexed citations
Drobe, Björn, et al.. (2011). Near Vision Posture in Myopic Chinese Children. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 52(14). 2701–2701.1 indexed citations
17.
Bao, Jinhua, et al.. (2008). Working Distance During Near Work in Emmetropic Chinese Children. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 49(13). 1793–1793.1 indexed citations
18.
Drobe, Björn, et al.. (2008). Working Distance in Bilingual Children: Is Chinese Text a Causal Factor for Myopia?. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 49(13). 3585–3585.3 indexed citations
19.
Drobe, Björn, et al.. (2007). Clinical Evaluation of Working Distance in Caucasian and Chinese Adults: A Comparison Study in France and Singapore. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 48(13). 962–962.7 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.