Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Generation and performance assessment of the global TanDEM-X digital elevation model
2017380 citationsPaola Rizzoli, Michele Martone et al.ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensingprofile →
Accuracy assessment of the global TanDEM-X Digital Elevation Model with GPS data
2018302 citationsBirgit Wessel, Martin Huber et al.ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensingprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of Birgit Wessel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Birgit Wessel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Birgit Wessel more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Birgit Wessel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Birgit Wessel. The network helps show where Birgit Wessel may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Birgit Wessel
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Birgit Wessel.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Birgit Wessel based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Birgit Wessel. Birgit Wessel is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Wessel, Birgit, Martin Huber, Christian Wohlfart, et al.. (2018). Accuracy assessment of the global TanDEM-X Digital Elevation Model with GPS data. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing. 139. 171–182.302 indexed citations breakdown →
9.
González, Carolina, Paola Rizzoli, Michele Martone, et al.. (2017). The New Global Digital Elevation Model :TanDEM-X DEM and its Final Performance. elib (German Aerospace Center). 8978.3 indexed citations
Gruber, Astrid, et al.. (2012). Quality assessment of first TanDEM-X DEMs for different terrain types. elib (German Aerospace Center). 101–104.9 indexed citations
12.
Schmitt, Andreas & Birgit Wessel. (2010). Introducing Partial Polarimetric Layers into a Curvelet-based Change Detection. elib (German Aerospace Center). 1–4.1 indexed citations
13.
Wessel, Birgit, et al.. (2010). Surface Water Body Detection in High-Resolution TerraSAR-X Data using Active Contour Models. elib (German Aerospace Center). 1–4.29 indexed citations
14.
Schmitt, Andreas, Birgit Wessel, & Achim Roth. (2009). CURVELET APPROACH FOR SAR IMAGE DENOISING, STRUCTURE ENHANCEMENT, AND CHANGE DETECTION. elib (German Aerospace Center).20 indexed citations
Wessel, Birgit, Ursula Marschalk, Astrid Gruber, et al.. (2008). Design of the DEM Mosaicking and Calibration Processor for TanDEM-X. elib (German Aerospace Center). 1–4.28 indexed citations
17.
Wessel, Birgit, Martin Huber, & Achim Roth. (2007). Automatic Image-to-Image Registration of Near-Real-Time SAR Images. elib (German Aerospace Center).2 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.